Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30535947›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2018

Targeted Therapies in CLL: Monotherapy Versus Combination Approaches.

Maliha Khan, Tanya Siddiqi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maliha KhanDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, University of Arkansas Medical Center, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Tanya SiddiqiDepartment of Hematology/Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA, 91010, USA. tsiddiqi@coh.org.
City Of Hope National Medical Center · USUniversity of Arkansas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWhile chemoimmunotherapy has improved outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), it is not curative, has significant relapse rates, and is not always well tolerated. Recently, novel targeted therapies have been developed to increase response rates and reduce toxicity, especially in high-risk disease. Current goals of CLL therapies are to produce deep and durable, especially minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative, remissions so as to allow patients to ultimately discontinue treatment for a while. Whether this can be achieved with single agents or combination regimens is being investigated. Here, we comment on what the results of recent and ongoing clinical trials mean for the future of CLL therapy. RECENT

findingsLarge trials have proven the efficacy of novel therapies including small-molecule inhibitors like ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax. These agents are approved as monotherapy for first-line treatment and/or in the relapsed/refractory setting. However, it appears that combining these drugs with other novel agents or with chemoimmunotherapy can give higher rates of MRD-negative remission, and delay disease resistance. Chimeric antigen receptor-T cells may change the outlook for patients with heavily refractory CLL. Further research will determine which drug combinations are optimal for the various subgroups of CLL patients.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellChimeric antigen receptor-T cellsChronic lymphocytic leukemiaCombination therapyIbrutinibIdelalisibVenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID30535947
OpenAlexW2904301904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.