ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2018
Targeted Therapies in CLL: Monotherapy Versus Combination Approaches.
Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy of venetoclax-based regiments in the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a systematic review and metanalysis.Annals of hematology · 2025Pooled it
- MiRNA-16-1 Suppresses Mcl-1 and Bcl-2 and Sensitizes Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Cells to BH3 Mimetic ABT-199.Cell journal · 2022Article
- MiRNA-Mediated Knock-Down of Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 Increases Fludarabine-Sensitivity in CLL-CII Cells.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Article
- Acalabrutinib: A Selective Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor for the Treatment of B-Cell Malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- An in vitro assay for biomarker discovery and dose prediction applied to ibrutinib plus venetoclax treatment of CLL.Leukemia · 2020Article
- Inhibition of bromodomain and extra-terminal proteins increases sensitivity to venetoclax in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewWhile chemoimmunotherapy has improved outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), it is not curative, has significant relapse rates, and is not always well tolerated. Recently, novel targeted therapies have been developed to increase response rates and reduce toxicity, especially in high-risk disease. Current goals of CLL therapies are to produce deep and durable, especially minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative, remissions so as to allow patients to ultimately discontinue treatment for a while. Whether this can be achieved with single agents or combination regimens is being investigated. Here, we comment on what the results of recent and ongoing clinical trials mean for the future of CLL therapy. RECENT
findingsLarge trials have proven the efficacy of novel therapies including small-molecule inhibitors like ibrutinib, idelalisib, and venetoclax. These agents are approved as monotherapy for first-line treatment and/or in the relapsed/refractory setting. However, it appears that combining these drugs with other novel agents or with chemoimmunotherapy can give higher rates of MRD-negative remission, and delay disease resistance. Chimeric antigen receptor-T cells may change the outlook for patients with heavily refractory CLL. Further research will determine which drug combinations are optimal for the various subgroups of CLL patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.