Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30535919›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2020

Qualitative assessments of myocardial ischemia by cardiac MRI and coronary stenosis by invasive coronary angiography in relation to quantitative perfusion by positron emission tomography in patients with known or suspected stable coronary artery disease.

Shahnaz Akil, Fredrik Hedeer, Marcus Carlsson, Håkan Arheden, Jenny Oddstig, Cecilia Hindorf, Jonas Jögi, David Erlinge, Henrik Engblom

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SimultaneousFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Anatomical and functional assessment of coronary artery disease in patients with stable angina: Which is the gold standard?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  4. Comparison between quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging and [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shahnaz AkilDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Physiology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, 22185, Lund, Sweden. Shahnaz.akil@med.lu.se.
Fredrik HedeerDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Physiology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, 22185, Lund, Sweden.
Marcus CarlssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Physiology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, 22185, Lund, Sweden.
Håkan ArhedenDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Physiology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, 22185, Lund, Sweden.
Jenny OddstigRadiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Cecilia HindorfRadiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Jonas JögiDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Physiology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, 22185, Lund, Sweden.
David ErlingeDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Department of Cardiology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Henrik EngblomDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Physiology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, 22185, Lund, Sweden.
Skåne University Hospital · SELund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo relate findings of qualitative evaluation of first-pass perfusion-CMR and anatomical evaluation on coronary angiography (CA) to the reference standard of quantitative perfusion, cardiac PET, in patients with suspected or known stable coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND

resultsForty-one patients referred for CA due to suspected stable CAD, prospectively performed adenosine stress/rest first-pass perfusion-CMR as well as

conclusionThe limited performance of qualitative assessment of presence of stable CAD with CMR and CA, when related to quantitative

Indexed as

Fractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialAdenosineAgedAged, 80 and overAngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary CirculationCoronary StenosisFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaMyocardial Perfusion ImagingAdenosineCardiac magnetic resonance imagingcardiac positron emission tomographycoronary angiographycoronary artery diseasemyocardial flow reserve

Identifiers

PMID30535919
PMCPMC7749089
OpenAlexW2904785235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.