ArticleMicrobial ecology2019
Comparative Analysis of Anuran Amphibian Skin Microbiomes Across Inland and Coastal Wetlands.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatial organization of cutaneous microbiomes reveals putative microbial contributions to host chemical defenses in the American toad.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Environmental and Host-Associated Microbiome inMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Potential Protective Role of Amphibian Skin Bacteria Against Water MoldJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Skin microbiomes of frogs vary among body regions, revealing differences that reflect known patterns of chytrid infection.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Variations of salinity during reproduction and development affect ontogenetic trajectories in a coastal amphibian.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024Article
- Ontogeny drives shifts in skin bacterial communities in facultatively paedomorphic salamanders.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2023Article
- Microbial Species-Area Relationships on the Skins of Amphibian Hosts.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- The Epidermal Microbiome Within an Aggregation of Leopard Sharks (Triakis semifasciata) Has Taxonomic Flexibility with Gene Functional Stability Across Three Time-points.Microbial ecology · 2023Article
- Interspecific and intraspecific Taylor's laws for frog skin microbes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Host ecology drives frog skin microbiome diversity across ecotone in South-Central North America.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2023Article
- Article
- Responses to saltwater exposure vary across species, populations and life stages in anuran amphibians.Conservation physiology · 2023Article
- The skin microbiome of Xenopus laevis and the effects of husbandry conditions.Animal microbiome · 2021Article
- Composition of the North American Wood Frog (Rana sylvatica) Bacterial Skin Microbiome and Seasonal Variation in Community Structure.Microbial ecology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Amphibians host a community of microbes on their skin that helps resist infectious disease via the dual influence of anti-pathogenic microbial species and emergent community dynamics. Many frogs rely on freshwater habitats, but salinization is rapidly increasing saltwater concentrations in wetlands around the globe, increasing the likelihood that frogs will come into contact with salt-contaminated habitats. Currently, we know little about how increased salt exposure will affect the symbiotic relationship between the skin microbes and frog hosts. To better understand how salt exposure in a natural context affects the frog skin microbiome, we use Hyla cinerea, a North American treefrog species that can inhabit brackish wetlands, to explore three questions. First, we determine the extent that microbial communities in the environment and on frog skin are similar across populations. Second, we assess the microbial species richness and relative abundance on frogs from habitats with different salinity levels to determine how salinity affects the microbiome. Third, we test whether the relative abundances of putatively pathogen-resistant bacterial species differ between frogs from inland and coastal environments. We found that the frog microbiome is more similar among frogs than to the microbial communities found in surface water and soil, but there is overlap between frog skin and the environmental samples. Skin microbial community richness did not differ among populations, but the relative abundances of microbes were different across populations and salinities. We found no differences in the relative abundances of the anti-fungal bacteria Janthinobacterium lividum, the genus Pseudomonas, and Serratia marcescens, suggesting that environmental exposure to saltwater has a limited influence on these putatively beneficial bacterial taxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.