ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2019
Sex estimation using the mandibular canine index components.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sexual dimorphism in odontometric parameters using cone beam CT: a systematic review.Head & face medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Evaluating the accuracy of sex estimation from human tooth volume: leveraging automated AI segmentation and comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms.Head & face medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning in sex estimation using CBCT morphometric measurements of canines.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Sex prediction from human tooth dimension by ROC curve analysis: a preliminary study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A new approach for sex prediction by evaluating mandibular arch and canine dimensions with machine-learning classifiers and intraoral scanners (a retrospective study).Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Canine sexual dimorphism in crown and root dimensions: a cone-beam computed tomographic study.The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology · 2024Article
- [Efficacy of the canine mandibular index in determining the sex of a Peruvian population: a cross-sectional study].Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia) · 2023Article
- Contributions of anatomy to forensic sex estimation: focus on head and neck bones.Forensic sciences research · 2022Review
- Possibility of Human Gender Recognition Using Raman Spectra of Teeth.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Morphometric research and sex estimation of lumbar vertebrae in a contemporary Spanish population.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mandibular canine index (MCI) has been described as a suitable methodology for sex estimation in forensic scenarios but there are contradictory reports about its accuracy. Moreover, the two mandibular canine teeth must be available, which is not always a viable option. The aim of this study was to strip the MCI by analyzing the MCI itself and its components, in order to optimize its use for sex estimation. The mesiodistal dimensions of the mandibular canine crown and the mandibular canine arch width were measured in a sample of 120 cast models. Five predictor variables were considered in this study: the standard MCI, a variation of the MCI using the left canine, and MCI components (MD43, MD33 and D33-43). Multivariate binary logistic regression was performed using stepwise forward approach to select the most statistical relevant variables on the probability of a cast being from a female. The estimated probability was then analyzed with respect to performance in sex classification (ROC analysis and optimal cut-offs accuracy) and compared with the performance of the univariate variables. MCI43 and MCI33 presented the lowest performance (64.2% and 63.3% respectively), and the highest overall accuracy was attained using the MD43 and MD33 (85.8% in both cases). The multivariate logistic model obtained (using MD43 and MD33) exhibited the same accuracy as the logistic model based solely on MD43 (85.8%). Our results suggest that MD43 should be used instead of MCI for sex estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30535911What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.