Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30535861›Full record

ArticleMonash bioethics review2018

Organs, embryos, and part-human chimeras: further applications of the social account of dignity.

Julian Koplin

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Monash bioethics review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Ethics of Buying DNA.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Julian KoplinMelbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. koplinj@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-2752-7334

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In their recent paper in this journal, Zümrüt Alpinar-Şencan and colleagues review existing dignity-based objections to organ markets and outline a new form of dignity-based objection they believe has more merit: one grounded in a social account of dignity. This commentary clarifies some aspects of the social account of dignity and then shows how this revised account can be applied to other perennial issues in bioethics, including the ethics of human embryo research and the ethics of creating part-human chimeras.

Indexed as

BioethicsEmbryo ResearchChimeraHumansPersonhoodRespectCommodificationEmbryo researchHuman dignityOrgan transplantationPart-human chimeras

Identifiers

PMID30535861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.