Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30535856›Full record

ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2019

[Clinical picture and diagnosis of neurotrophic keratopathy].

E M Messmer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

E M MessmerAugenklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336, München, Deutschland. emessmer@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurotrophic keratopathy is characterized by corneal surface alterations, persistent corneal epithelial defects and/or corneal ulcerations associated with corneal sensory abnormalities. Due to the variable clinical picture neurotrophic keratopathy is often overlooked or diagnosed too late in the course of the disease.

objectiveDiscussion of the clinical picture of neurotrophic keratopathy and recommendations for correct diagnosis. MATERIAL AND

methodsAnalysis of the existing literature and discussion of basic recent publications.

resultsNeurotrophic keratopathy is defined as a disease related to alterations in corneal nerves leading to impairment in sensory and trophic function with consequent breakdown of the corneal epithelium affecting health and integrity of the tear film, epithelium and stroma. It can occur with infections, autoimmune diseases, after trauma or ocular surgery, with intracranial neoplasia, in systemic diseases and genetic syndromes. It is classified into three stages: mild (epithelial changes without epithelial defects), moderate (epithelial defects) and severe (stromal involvement). The clinical hallmark is reduced or absent corneal sensation. Therefore, corneal sensitivity testing is essential in the diagnosis of neurotrophic keratopathy along with the patient history, clinical examination and diagnostic tests, such as vital stains and, if possible, in vivo confocal microscopy.

conclusionThe correct diagnosis and classification of neurotrophic keratopathy enable a stage-adapted step-ladder therapeutic approach with subsequent reduction of progression and complications of the disease.

Indexed as

Corneal DiseasesCorneal Dystrophies, HereditaryEpithelium, CornealKeratitisTrigeminal Nerve DiseasesCorneaHumansCorneal epithelial defectCorneal nervesCorneal sensationCorneal ulcerStaged treatment

Identifiers

PMID30535856
OpenAlexW2904699851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.