Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30535753›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2019

Detection and identification of fungi in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from immunocompromised patients using panfungal PCR.

Dita Ricna, Martina Lengerova, Matej Bezdicek, Iva Kocmanova, Lubos Drgona, Barbora Weinbergerova, Jiri Mayer, Zdenek Racil

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Biosensors and Diagnostics for Fungal Detection.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Detection ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dita RicnaDepartment of Internal Medicine - Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Martina LengerovaDepartment of Internal Medicine - Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. Lengerova.Martina@fnbrno.cz.
Matej BezdicekDepartment of Internal Medicine - Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Iva KocmanovaDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Lubos DrgonaDepartment of Oncohematology, Comenius University in Bratislava and National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Barbora WeinbergerovaDepartment of Internal Medicine - Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jiri MayerDepartment of Internal Medicine - Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Zdenek RacilDepartment of Internal Medicine - Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Masaryk University · CZUniversity Hospital Brno · CZComenius University Bratislava · SK

Funding

Masarykova Univerzita MUNI/A/1105/2018Ministerstvo Zdravotnictv? Cesk? Republiky 65269705Technologick? Agentura ?esk? Republiky TE02000058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid diagnostics of fungal pneumonia and initiation of appropriate therapy are still challenging. In this study, we used two panfungal assays to test bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples to prove their ability to confirm invasive fungal disease diagnosis and identify causative agents. Two methods targeting different fungal rDNA regions were used, and the obtained PCR products were sequenced directly or after cloning. In total, 106 BALF samples from 104 patients were tested. After sequencing, we obtained 578 sequences. Four hundred thirty-seven sequences were excluded from further analysis due to duplication (n = 335) or similarity with sequences detected in the extraction control sample (n = 102); 141 unique sequences were analyzed. Altogether, 23/141 (16%) of the fungi detected belonged to pathogenic species, and 63/141 (45%) were identified as various yeasts; a variety of environmental or very rare fungal human pathogens represented 29/141 (21%) of the total and 26/141 (18%) were described as uncultured fungus. Panfungal PCR detected fungal species that would be missed by specific methods in only one case (probable cryptococcosis). Panfungal PCR followed by sequencing has limited use for testing BALF samples due to frequent commensal or environmental fungal species pickup.

Indexed as

Immunocompromised HostBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidDNA, FungalDNA, IntergenicDNA PrimersFemaleFungiHumansInvasive Fungal InfectionsMaleMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNADNA, FungalDNA, IntergenicDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID30535753
OpenAlexW2904234495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.