ArticleDrug safety2019
Evaluation of the Reported Rates of Severe Hypersensitivity Reactions Associated with Ferric Carboxymaltose and Iron (III) Isomaltoside 1000 in Europe Based on Data from EudraVigilance and VigiBase™ between 2014 and 2017.
Article in Drug safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04976179 (Intravenous Versus Oral Iron for Iron Deficiency Anaemia in Pregnant Nigerian Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intravenous Versus Oral Iron for Iron Deficiency Anaemia in Pregnant Nigerian Women (IVON): an Open Label, Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Signal detection of ferric carboxymaltose-induced serious adverse events: disproportionality analysis of FAERS and VigiBase data and systematic review of case reports.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Observational
- The Intersection of Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency Anemia: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Review
- Iron Deficiency Anaemia in Pregnancy: A Narrative Review from a Clinical Perspective.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- IV iron formulations and use in adults.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2023Article
- Iron parenteral administration: an expert opinion on the assessment of fetal wellbeing.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2022Article
- Iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy: A contemporary review.Obstetric medicine · 2021Review
- Article
- Article
- A Pooled Analysis of Serum Phosphate Measurements and Potential Hypophosphataemia Events in 45 Interventional Trials with Ferric Carboxymaltose.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Fatal anaphylactic reaction due to ferric carboxymaltose: A case report.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Hypophosphatemia Associated with Intravenous Iron Therapies for Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Systematic Literature Review.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2020Review
- Iron homeostasis and perioperative management of iron deficiency.BJA education · 2019Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) are among the known adverse events of intravenous (i.v.) iron products. Of these, particularly severe HSRs such as anaphylaxis are of great clinical concern due to their life-threatening potential.
methodsThis was a retrospective pharmacoepidemiological study with a case-population design evaluating the number of reported severe HSRs following administration of the two i.v. iron products-ferric carboxymaltose and iron (III) isomaltoside 1000-in relation to exposure in European countries from January 2014 to December 2017. Exposure to both products was estimated using IQVIA MIDAS sales data in European countries. Information on spontaneously reported severe HSRs was obtained from and analysed separately for the two established safety surveillance databases EudraVigilance and VigiBase™ using the MedDRA
resultsBetween 2014 and 2017, the reporting rate of severe HSRs per 100,000 defined daily doses (100 mg dose equivalents of iron) varied from 0.3 to 0.5 for ferric carboxymaltose and from 2.4 to 5.0 for iron (III) isomaltoside 1000. The reporting rate ratio for iron (III) isomaltoside 1000 versus ferric carboxymaltose was between 5.6 (95% CI 3.5-9.0) and 16.2 (95% CI 9.4-27.8).
conclusionsFindings suggest that iron (III) isomaltoside 1000 is associated with a higher reporting rate of severe HSRs related to estimated exposure than ferric carboxymaltose in European countries. Future research investigating the occurrence of severe HSRs associated with i.v. ferric carboxymaltose and iron (III) isomaltoside 1000 is needed to broaden the evidence for benefit-risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.