Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30535583›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2019

Updates on the use of intravesical therapies for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: how, when and what.

Charles C Peyton, Juan Chipollini, Mounsif Azizi, Ashish M Kamat, Scott M Gilbert, Phillippe E Spiess

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Intravesical gemcitabine for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Salvage therapy for BCG failure with intravesical sequential gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with recurrent NMIBC.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
  13. Metabolomic Signatures of Treatment Response in Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. BCG Vaccine-The Road Not Taken.Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charles C PeytonH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Juan ChipolliniH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Mounsif AziziH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Ashish M KamatThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Scott M GilbertH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Phillippe E SpiessH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA. philippe.spiess@moffitt.org.
Moffitt Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntravesical therapy has been an important aspect of the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) for 40 years. Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is considered standard of care for intermediate and high-grade non-invasive disease, yet understanding the nuances of subsequent intravesical therapy is important for any provider managing bladder cancer. Herein, we review the literature and describe optimal use of intravesical therapies for NMIBC.

methodsA comprehensive search of the medical literature was performed and highlighted in this review of intravesical therapy for NMIBC.

resultsPost-resection intravesical Mitomycin C therapy for low-risk disease remains an important component of care, and gemcitabine now has level-one evidence demonstrating efficacy in this setting but is not yet a guideline recommendation. BCG intravesical therapy remains the most effective therapy preventing recurrence and progression of intermediate and high-risk NMIBC. Adequately characterizing BCG-failure is critical in determining the next step in management which includes radical cystectomy, additional intravesical immunotherapy, chemotherapy with intravesical gemcitabine ± docetaxel and clinical trials.

conclusionsIntravesical therapy remains the mainstay of treatment for NMIBC and bladder preservation. Intravesical induction BCG followed by maintenance therapy remains standard of care for intermediate and high-risk patients. Detailing the timing and characteristics of recurrence after intravesical therapy is crucial in determining subsequent treatment recommendations. Current clinical trials focus on systemic immunotherapy and enhancing the intravesical immune response by augmenting the delivery mechanism.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, IntravesicalAlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsBCG VaccineDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessPractice Guidelines as TopicRisk AssessmentTreatment FailureUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntineoplastic AgentsBCG VaccineBCG failureIntravesical therapyNon-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Identifiers

PMID30535583
OpenAlexW2905025630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.