SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2019
Efficacy and safety of autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation on multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.Bone marrow transplantation · 2020Pooled it
- "A second birthday"? Experiences of persons with multiple sclerosis treated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-a qualitative interview study.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- High-Efficacy Therapies for Treatment-Naïve Individuals with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.CNS drugs · 2022Review
- Autologous Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neurology and therapy · 2022Article
- B-Cell Reconstitution After Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Sclerosis.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2022Article
- Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: Monocentric Case Series and Systematic Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Economics of Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies in the USA.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2021Review
- The Outcome of Stem Cell-Based Therapies on the Immune Responses in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Review
- Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (AHSCT): Standard of Care for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients.Neurology and therapy · 2020Article
- The underpinning biology relating to multiple sclerosis disease modifying treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic.Multiple sclerosis and related disorders · 2020Review
- Intensive immunosuppression followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2020Review
- Autologous haematopoietic stem cell therapy for multiple sclerosis: a review for supportive care clinicians on behalf of the Autoimmune Diseases Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.Current opinion in supportive and palliative care · 2019Review
- Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Multiple Sclerosis: Changing Paradigms in the Era of Novel Agents.Stem cells international · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAutologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (AHSCT) has been utilized as a treatment option for multiple sclerosis (MS) since 1995. However, this procedure has not been widely implemented in clinical practice owing to its mortality risk. Here, we conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of AHSCT in MS treatment, aiming to optimize the benefit/risk ratio of this therapeutic strategy.
methodsWe searched the PubMed Web site and clinicaltrials.gov databases. The efficacy endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and disease activity-free survival. The safety outcomes were transplant-related mortality (TRM) and overall deaths.
resultsEighteen eligible studies with a total of 732 participants were enrolled. The PFS was 75% (95% CI, 0.69-0.81), and the estimate of disease activity-free survival was 61% with 48-month follow-up. Subgroups analysis showed that low- and intermediate-intensity regimens were associated with higher PFS 80%. Relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) benefited more from AHSCT than other MS subtypes with PFS 85%. Patients with Gd+ lesions at baseline MRI responded better to AHSCT with PFS 77%. The estimate of TRM was 1.34% (95% CI, 0.39-2.30), and the overall mortality was 3.58%. TRM was significantly higher in high-intensity regimen studies (3.13%) and in older studies (1.93%) performed before 2006.
conclusionsThis meta-analysis provides evidences that AHSCT can induce long-term remissions for MS patients with a high degree of safety. We indicate low- and intermediate-intensity regimens and RRMS patients with the presence of Gd+ lesions at baseline MRI can obtain the optimal benefit/risk ratio from AHSCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30535563What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.