ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2019
Quantitative CT and
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancing mesenchymal stem cell therapy for kidney diseases in companion animals: from mechanisms to clinical application.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- Review
- Ultrasound Imaging of Macrophages Intracellularly Labelled with Biosynthetic Gas Vesicles.Molecular imaging and biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Multinuclear MRI in Drug Discovery.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Ultrasound imaging tracking of mesenchymal stem cells intracellularly labeled with biosynthetic gas vesicles for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.Theranostics · 2022Article
- Special issue on fluorine-19 magnetic resonance: technical solutions, research promises and frontier applications.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Article
- Noninvasive Monitoring of Allogeneic Stem Cell Delivery with Dual-Modality Imaging-Visible Microcapsules in a Rabbit Model of Peripheral Arterial Disease.Stem cells international · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPeripheral artery disease (PAD) affects 12-14% of the world population, and many are not eligible for conventional treatment. For these patients, microencapsulated stem cells (SCs) offer a novel means to transplant mismatched therapeutic SCs to prevent graft immunorejection. Using c-arm CT and MATERIALS AND
methodsXMRCaps were produced by impregnating 12% perfluorooctylbromine (PFOB) with rabbit or human SCs (AlloSC and XenoSC, respectively). Volume and
resultsXMRCap volumes and concentrations showed good agreement between CT and MRI both in vitro and in vivo in XenoSC rabbits. Injected capsules showed small variations over time and were similar between AlloSC and XenoSC rabbits. Histological staining revealed high cell viability and intact capsules 2 weeks after administration.
conclusionsQuantitative and non-invasive tracking XMRCaps using CT and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.