Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30535522›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2018

Colonic hypereosinophilia in ulcerative colitis may help to predict the failure of steroid therapy.

Giuseppe Leoncini, Vincenzo Villanacci, Maria Grazia Marin, Valentina Crisafulli, Moris Cadei, Elisabetta Antonelli, Claudio Leoci, Gabrio Bassotti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe LeonciniPathology Unit, ASST del Garda, Desenzano del Garda (Brescia), Brescia, Italy.
Vincenzo VillanacciPathology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Maria Grazia MarinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, ASST del Garda, Desenzano del Garda (Brescia), Brescia, Italy.
Valentina CrisafulliPathology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Moris CadeiPathology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Elisabetta AntonelliGastroenterology Unit, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Claudio LeociDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, ASST del Garda, Desenzano del Garda (Brescia), Brescia, Italy.
Gabrio BassottiGastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy Section, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia Medical School, Perugia, Italy. gabassot@tin.it.
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITCasa di Cura Villa Garda · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale del Garda

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough glucocorticosteroids (GS) and mesalazine are effective and widely employed to treat moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC), information regarding the factors responsible for response to such therapy is still scarce. One of these factors is thought to be an increased number of mucosal eosinophils. The aim of our study was to determine whether the presence of hypereosinophilia in colonic mucosa of UC patients might influence the short-term response to l treatment with GS and mesasalazine.

methodsClinical, endoscopic, and pathologic data from patients with a recent diagnosis of moderate UC, who had not undergone treatment, were obtained, and the short-term outcome after 1 month of conventional first-line treatment (mesalazine plus GS) was evaluated.

resultsThere were 53 patients with a median age of 37 years (95% CI 30-47).Overall, at the end of treatment period 16 (30%) patients responded, whereas a response was not observed in the other 37 (70%) patients. Interestingly, all patients of this latter group had colonic mucosal hypereosinophilia. No significant differences were found between the two groups concerning sex and age at diagnosis, but hypereosinophilia was inversely correlated with the duration of the disease (p = 0.054), and significantly correlated to the localization of UC (p = 0.0023). In addition, The Mayo score was significantly higher in patients with hypereosinophilia (median 8; 95% CI 8-9;) when compared to patients without hypereosinophilia (median 7; 95% CI 7-7, p < 0.0001) including the Mayo endoscopic subscore (median 3; 95% CI 2-3 vs median 2; 95% CI 2-2, respectively; p = 0.007).

conclusionsThe presence of colonic mucosal hypereosinophilia may be useful to predict the short-term outcome to conventional first-line therapy in treatment-naïve UC patients. It remains to be seen whether this might be important in modifying the first-line therapy in this subgroup of patients.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Inflammatory AgentsColitis, UlcerativeColonColonic DiseasesDrug Therapy, CombinationEosinophiliaFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansIntestinal MucosaMaleMesalamineSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory AgentsGlucocorticoidsMesalamineEosinophilsIntestinal MucosaOutcomeTreatmentUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID30535522
OpenAlexW2905352475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.