Trial reportEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2019
Evaluation of a novel cardioversion intervention for atrial fibrillation: the Ottawa AF cardioversion protocol.
Trial report in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Developing a Standardized Atrial Fibrillation Cardioversion Protocol
Comparison of Biphasic Truncated Exponential and Pulsed Waveforms for Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation-High Energy Escalation Strategy and Introduction to Manual Pressure Application
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Anteriolateral versus anterior-posterior electrodes in external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.Clinical cardiology · 2023Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of the Transthoracic Impedance during Cardiac Defibrillation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Article
- Impact of Defibrillator Electrode Placement on Outcome of Electrical Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Observational Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Observational
- Article
- Atrial Fibrillation: Rate Versus Rhythm Control.HCA healthcare journal of medicine · 2023Review
- Acute rate control in atrial fibrillation: an urgent need for the clinician.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Article
- Orthogonal electrical cardioversion in atrial fibrillation refractory to biphasic shocks: a case series.European heart journal. Case reports · 2020Article
- Natriuretic peptides: biomarkers for atrial fibrillation management.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2020Review
- Facilitated electrical cardioversion: does the selection of the antiarrhythmic drug matter?International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsElectrical cardioversion is commonly performed to restore sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but it is unsuccessful in 10-12% of attempts. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a novel cardioversion protocol for this arrhythmia. METHODS AND
resultsConsecutive elective cardioversion attempts for AF between October 2012 and July 2017 at a tertiary cardiovascular centre before (Phase I) and after (Phase II) implementing the Ottawa AF cardioversion protocol (OAFCP) as an institutional initiative in July 2015 were evaluated. The primary outcome was cardioversion success, defined as ≥2 consecutive sinus beats or atrial-paced beats in patients with implanted cardiac devices. Secondary outcomes were first shock success, sustained success (sinus or atrial-paced rhythm on 12-lead electrocardiogram prior to discharge from hospital), and procedural complications. Cardioversion was successful in 459/500 (91.8%) in Phase I compared with 386/389 (99.2%) in Phase II (P < 0.001). This improvement persisted after adjusting for age, body mass index, amiodarone use, and transthoracic impedance using modified Poisson regression [adjusted relative risk 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.11; P < 0.001] and when analysed as an interrupted time series (change in level +9.5%, 95% CI 6.8-12.1%; P < 0.001). The OAFCP was also associated with greater first shock success (88.4% vs. 79.2%; P < 0.001) and sustained success (91.6% vs 84.7%; P=0.002). No serious complications occurred.
conclusionImplementing the OAFCP was associated with a 7.4% absolute increase in cardioversion success and increases in first shock and sustained success without serious procedural complications. Its use could safely improve cardioversion success in patients with AF. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: www.clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02192957.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.