Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30535367›Full record

Trial reportEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2019

Evaluation of a novel cardioversion intervention for atrial fibrillation: the Ottawa AF cardioversion protocol.

F Daniel Ramirez, Mouhannad M Sadek, Isabelle Boileau, Mark Cleland, Pablo B Nery, Girish M Nair, Calum J Redpath, Martin S Green, Darryl R Davis, Karen Charron and 6 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02192957 nacompletednot on this map

Developing a Standardized Atrial Fibrillation Cardioversion Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorDavid BirnieRan2015 to 2018Enrolled389ConditionsAtrial FibrillationArmsLifepak 20E Defibrillator, Licence No: 61944
NCT05316753 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Biphasic Truncated Exponential and Pulsed Waveforms for Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation-High Energy Escalation Strategy and Introduction to Manual Pressure Application

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity National Heart HospitalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled94ConditionsAtrial FibrillationArmsCardioversion with a pulsed biphasic waveform, Cardioversion with a biphasic truncated exponential waveform
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Atrial Fibrillation: Rate Versus Rhythm Control.HCA healthcare journal of medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Acute rate control in atrial fibrillation: an urgent need for the clinician.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Natriuretic peptides: biomarkers for atrial fibrillation management.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2020
    Review
  10. Facilitated electrical cardioversion: does the selection of the antiarrhythmic drug matter?International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

F Daniel RamirezDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Mouhannad M SadekDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Isabelle BoileauDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Mark ClelandBiomedical Engineering, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Pablo B NeryDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Girish M NairDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Calum J RedpathDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Martin S GreenDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Darryl R DavisDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Karen CharronDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Joshua HenneBiomedical Engineering, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Timothy ZakutneyBiomedical Engineering, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Rob S B BeanlandsDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Benjamin HibbertDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
George A WellsSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
David H BirnieDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsElectrical cardioversion is commonly performed to restore sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but it is unsuccessful in 10-12% of attempts. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a novel cardioversion protocol for this arrhythmia. METHODS AND

resultsConsecutive elective cardioversion attempts for AF between October 2012 and July 2017 at a tertiary cardiovascular centre before (Phase I) and after (Phase II) implementing the Ottawa AF cardioversion protocol (OAFCP) as an institutional initiative in July 2015 were evaluated. The primary outcome was cardioversion success, defined as ≥2 consecutive sinus beats or atrial-paced beats in patients with implanted cardiac devices. Secondary outcomes were first shock success, sustained success (sinus or atrial-paced rhythm on 12-lead electrocardiogram prior to discharge from hospital), and procedural complications. Cardioversion was successful in 459/500 (91.8%) in Phase I compared with 386/389 (99.2%) in Phase II (P < 0.001). This improvement persisted after adjusting for age, body mass index, amiodarone use, and transthoracic impedance using modified Poisson regression [adjusted relative risk 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.11; P < 0.001] and when analysed as an interrupted time series (change in level +9.5%, 95% CI 6.8-12.1%; P < 0.001). The OAFCP was also associated with greater first shock success (88.4% vs. 79.2%; P < 0.001) and sustained success (91.6% vs 84.7%; P=0.002). No serious complications occurred.

conclusionImplementing the OAFCP was associated with a 7.4% absolute increase in cardioversion success and increases in first shock and sustained success without serious procedural complications. Its use could safely improve cardioversion success in patients with AF. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: www.clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02192957.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationElectric CountershockClinical ProtocolsElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareQuality ImprovementTreatment OutcomeAtrial fibrillationCardioversionDefibrillationProtocolQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID30535367
PMCPMC6479509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.