Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30535326›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2019

BLINK: a package for the next level of genome-wide association studies with both individuals and markers in the millions.

Meng Huang, Xiaolei Liu, Yao Zhou, Ryan M Summers, Zhiwu Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 499 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
499citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

499 citing papers in PubMed, 779 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genome-wide association mapping of tan spot resistance in a modified NAM population derived from synthetic hexaploid wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  7. High-resolution GWAS and diagnostic functional marker development for leaf shape in soybean.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  8. Evaluating reaction norm and fixed effect models for genomic selection of end-use quality in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Identification of septoria nodorum blotch susceptibility genes in hard winter wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

439 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Meng HuangDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, 1170 NE Stadium Way, Pullman, Washington, 99164-6420, USA.
Xiaolei LiuKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, 1 Shizishan Street, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, China.
Yao ZhouDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, 1170 NE Stadium Way, Pullman, Washington, 99164-6420, USA.
Ryan M SummersSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, 355 NE Spokane Street, Pullman, Washington, 99164-2752, USA.
Zhiwu ZhangDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, 1170 NE Stadium Way, Pullman, Washington, 99164-6420, USA.
Washington State University · USHuazhong Agricultural University · CNWashington State University Spokane · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Big datasets, accumulated from biomedical and agronomic studies, provide the potential to identify genes that control complex human diseases and agriculturally important traits through genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, big datasets also lead to extreme computational challenges, especially when sophisticated statistical models are employed to simultaneously reduce false positives and false negatives. The newly developed fixed and random model circulating probability unification (FarmCPU) method uses a bin method under the assumption that quantitative trait nucleotides (QTNs) are evenly distributed throughout the genome. The estimated QTNs are used to separate a mixed linear model into a computationally efficient fixed effect model (FEM) and a computationally expensive random effect model (REM), which are then used iteratively. To completely eliminate the computationally expensive REM, we replaced REM with FEM by using Bayesian information criteria. To eliminate the requirement that QTNs be evenly distributed throughout the genome, we replaced the bin method with linkage disequilibrium information. The new method is called Bayesian-information and Linkage-disequilibrium Iteratively Nested Keyway (BLINK). Both real and simulated data analyses demonstrated that BLINK improves statistical power compared to FarmCPU, in addition to remarkably reducing computing time. Now, a dataset with one million individuals and one-half million markers can be analyzed within three hours, instead of one week using FarmCPU.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSoftwareAnimalsBayes TheoremComputational BiologyFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLinkage DisequilibriumMaleModels, GeneticPlants

Identifiers

PMID30535326
PMCPMC6365300
OpenAlexW2953380456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.