ArticleJAMA neurology2019
Sex and Race Differences in the Association of Incident Ischemic Stroke With Risk Factors.
Article in JAMA neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 180 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ethnic Inequalities in Stroke Incidence Patterns and Trends in High-Income Countries (2015-2025).Neuroepidemiology · 2026Pooled it
- Associations between posttraumatic stress and stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of traumatic stress · 2023Pooled it
- Risk factors and predictors for venous thromboembolism in people with ischemic stroke: A systematic review.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2022Pooled it
- Chronic Stroke Sensorimotor Impairment Is Related to Smaller Hippocampal Volumes: An ENIGMA Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Association between fasting blood glucose levels and stroke events: a large-scale community-based cohort study from China.BMJ open · 2021Pooled it
- Sex Differences in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Risk of all-cause and CHD mortality in women versus men with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of endocrinology · 2019Pooled it
- The Neurology of Menopause.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Review
- Association of cardiovascular risks and carotid stiffening at ultrafast ultrasound imaging in young populations.European radiology · 2026Article
- Article
- A comprehensive review of ischemic heart disease: pathophysiology, current treatments, natural products-based therapies, and nanotherapeutics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- The Impact of Alteplase Coverage on Health Equity for the Treatment of Ischemic Stroke in the USA: A Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Applied health economics and health policy · 2025Article
- Association of Serum Cystatin C with Stroke Morbidity and All-Cause and Cardio-Cerebrovascular Mortality: Evidence from the NHANES.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sex differences in age-associated neurological diseases-A roadmap for reliable and high-yield research.Science advances · 2025Review
- Associations of Social, Behavioral, and Clinical Factors With Sex Differences in Stroke Recurrence and Poststroke Mortality.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025Article
- Psychological Factors and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Risk in Stroke Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health psychology research · 2025Article
- Global, regional, and national epidemiology of ischemic stroke from 1990 to 2021.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Population data study reveals pain as a possible protective factor against cerebrovascular disease in cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2024Article
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Race-specific and sex-specific stroke risk varies across the lifespan, yet few reports describe sex differences in stroke risk separately in black individuals and white individuals. Objective: To examine incidence and risk factors for ischemic stroke by sex for black and white individuals. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included participants 45 years and older who were stroke-free from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort, enrolled from the continental United States 2003 through 2007 with follow-up through October 2016. Data were analyzed from March 2018 to September 2018. Exposures: Sex and race. Main Outcomes and Measures: Physician-adjudicated incident ischemic stroke, self-reported race/ethnicity, and measured and self-reported risk factors. Results: A total of 25 789 participants (14 170 women [54.9%]; 10 301 black individuals [39.9%]) were included. Over 222 120 person-years of follow-up, 939 ischemic strokes occurred: 159 (16.9%) in black men, 326 in white men (34.7%), 217 in black women (23.1%), and 237 in white women (25.2%). Between 45 and 64 years of age, white women had 32% lower stroke risk than white men (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.68 [95% CI, 0.49-0.94]), and black women had a 28% lower risk than black men (IRR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.52-0.99]). Lower stroke risk in women than men persisted at age 65 through 74 years in white individuals (IRR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.55-0.94]) but not in black individuals (IRR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.68-1.30]); however, the race-sex interaction was not significant. At 75 years and older, there was no sex difference in stroke risk for either race. For white individuals, associations of systolic blood pressure (women: hazard ratio [HR], 1.13 [95% CI, 1.05-1.22]; men: 1.04 [95% CI, 0.97-1.11]; P = .099), diabetes (women: HR, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.35-2.52]; men: 1.13 [95% CI, 0.86-1.49]; P = .02), and heart disease (women: HR, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.30-2.39]; men, 1.26 [95% CI, 0.99-1.60]; P = .09) with stroke risk were larger for women than men, while antihypertensive medication use had a smaller association in women than men (women: HR, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.89-1.54]; men: 1.61 [95% CI, 1.29-2.03]; P = .08). In black individuals, there was no evidence of a sex difference for any risk factors. Conclusions and Relevance: For both races, at age 45 through 64 years, women were at lower stroke risk than men, and there was no sex difference at 75 years or older; however, the sex difference pattern may differ by race from age 65 through 74 years. The association of risk factors on stroke risk differed by race-sex groups. While the need for primordial prevention, optimal management, and control of risk factors is universal across all age, racial/ethnic, and sex groups, some demographic subgroups may require earlier and more aggressive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.