Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30535196›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2019

Divergent evolution in the genomes of closely related lacertids, Lacerta viridis and L. bilineata, and implications for speciation.

Sree Rohit Raj Kolora, Anne Weigert, Amin Saffari, Stephanie Kehr, Maria Beatriz Walter Costa, Cathrin Spröer, Henrike Indrischek, Manjusha Chintalapati, Konrad Lohse, Gero Doose and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

Sree Rohit Raj KoloraGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
Anne WeigertMolecular Evolution and Systematics of Animals, Institute of Biology, University of Leipzig, Talstrasse 33, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
Amin SaffariBioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, and Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, Universität Leipzig, Härtelstrasse 16-18, Leipzig, 04107, Germany.
Stephanie KehrBioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, and Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, Universität Leipzig, Härtelstrasse 16-18, Leipzig, 04107, Germany.
Maria Beatriz Walter CostaBioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, and Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, Universität Leipzig, Härtelstrasse 16-18, Leipzig, 04107, Germany.
Cathrin SpröerDepartment of Microbial Ecology and Diversity Research, Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Inhoffenstrasse 7B, Braunschweig, 38124, Germany.
Henrike IndrischekMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Pfotenhauerstrasse 108, Dresden, 01307, Germany.
Manjusha ChintalapatiMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
Konrad LohseInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings, Charlotte Auerbach Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3FL, United Kingdom.
Gero DooseBioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, and Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, Universität Leipzig, Härtelstrasse 16-18, Leipzig, 04107, Germany.
Jörg OvermannGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
Boyke BunkDepartment of Microbial Ecology and Diversity Research, Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Inhoffenstrasse 7B, Braunschweig, 38124, Germany.
Christoph BleidornGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
Annegret Grimm-SeyfarthDepartment of Conservation Biology, UFZ - Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research, Permoserstrasse 15, Leipzig, 04318, Germany.
Klaus HenleDepartment of Conservation Biology, UFZ - Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research, Permoserstrasse 15, Leipzig, 04318, Germany.
Katja NowickHuman Biology Group, Institute for Zoology, Department of Biology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Straße 1-3, Berlin, D-14195, Germany.
Rui FariaDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, Alfred Building, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom.
Peter F StadlerGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
Martin SchlegelGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DEHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research · DELeibniz Institute DSMZ – German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures · DELeipzig University · DEMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DEBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESMax Planck Institute for Physics · DEUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLacerta viridis and Lacerta bilineata are sister species of European green lizards (eastern and western clades, respectively) that, until recently, were grouped together as the L. viridis complex. Genetic incompatibilities were observed between lacertid populations through crossing experiments, which led to the delineation of two separate species within the L. viridis complex. The population history of these sister species and processes driving divergence are unknown. We constructed the first high-quality de novo genome assemblies for both L. viridis and L. bilineata through Illumina and PacBio sequencing, with annotation support provided from transcriptome sequencing of several tissues. To estimate gene flow between the two species and identify factors involved in reproductive isolation, we studied their evolutionary history, identified genomic rearrangements, detected signatures of selection on non-coding RNA, and on protein-coding genes.

findingsHere we show that gene flow was primarily unidirectional from L. bilineata to L. viridis after their split at least 1.15 million years ago. We detected positive selection of the non-coding repertoire; mutations in transcription factors; accumulation of divergence through inversions; selection on genes involved in neural development, reproduction, and behavior, as well as in ultraviolet-response, possibly driven by sexual selection, whose contribution to reproductive isolation between these lacertid species needs to be further evaluated.

conclusionThe combination of short and long sequence reads resulted in one of the most complete lizard genome assemblies. The characterization of a diverse array of genomic features provided valuable insights into the demographic history of divergence among European green lizards, as well as key species differences, some of which are candidates that could have played a role in speciation. In addition, our study generated valuable genomic resources that can be used to address conservation-related issues in lacertids.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeAnimalsFemaleGenomicsLizardsMaleSequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, RNAde novo hybrid assemblygene flowinversionsnoncoding RNAPacBio and Illuminapositive selectionsister speciestranscriptsUV responsezinc fingers

Identifiers

PMID30535196
PMCPMC6381762
OpenAlexW2903664387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.