ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2019
Reward improves response inhibition by enhancing attentional capture.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of COMT Suppression in a Randomized Trial on the Neural Correlates of Inhibitory Processing Among People With Alcohol Use Disorder.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025Trial
- Neural correlates of altered reward-driven attention in chronic pain and opioid use.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effective connectivity analysis of response inhibition functional network.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- A network approach to the investigation of childhood irritability: probing frustration using social stimuli.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2024Article
- Reward-based modulation of task-switching performance: a diffusion model analysis.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- The influence of emotional feedback material type on attentional capture at different presentation times.PloS one · 2024Article
- Neural substrates of behavioral inhibitory control during the two-choice oddball task: functional neuroimaging evidence.Psychoradiology · 2023Article
- Reward-motivated memories influence new learning across development.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- Improved response inhibition induced by attentional capture is associated with physical activity.PeerJ · 2022Article
- Distinct neural activation patterns of age in subcomponents of inhibitory control: A fMRI meta-analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Differing Time Courses of Reward-Related Attentional Processing: An EEG Source-Space Analysis.Brain topography · 2021Article
- Response Inhibition and Binge Drinking During Transition to University: An fMRI Study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reward plays a crucial role in enhancing response inhibition. While it is generally assumed that the process of response inhibition involves attentional capture and the stopping of action, it is unclear whether this reflects a direct impact of reward on response inhibition or rather an indirect mediation via attentional capture. Here, we employed a revised stop-signal task (SST) that separated these two cognitive elements, by including a continue signal that required the same motor response as in go trials, but also attention to a cue, as in stop trials. We first confirmed the engagement of the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) during stop and continue trials, both of which required the attentional capture of the task-relevant cue, but only one of which required motor inhibition. The pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) was specifically activated by the contrast of the stop trials with the continue trials. The results indicated that the IFG played an important role in attentional capture by unexpected stimuli, while the pre-SMA was responsible for the direct control of motor inhibition. Behavioral performance of the SST was improved by reward, and moreover, reward induced an increase in IFG activity. In addition, this advantageous reward effect was associated with enhanced connectivity between the anterior cingulate cortex and the IFG. These results indicated that the reward facilitation effect on response inhibition was indirect, occurring via a change in attentional processing. The present data confirm the specific function of the IFG and pre-SMA in response inhibition and provide straightforward evidence that reward can increase attentional capture-related activation in the IFG, which in turn improves the performance of response inhibition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.