Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30535037›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2019

The GMO90+ Project: Absence of Evidence for Biologically Meaningful Effects of Genetically Modified Maize-based Diets on Wistar Rats After 6-Months Feeding Comparative Trial.

Xavier Coumoul, Rémi Servien, Ludmila Juricek, Yael Kaddouch-Amar, Yannick Lippi, Laureline Berthelot, Claire Naylies, Marie-Line Morvan, Jean-Philippe Antignac, Christèle Desdoits-Lethimonier and 22 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Agricultural biotechnology in the courts: judicial opinions and commentary.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. GMO discussion on Twitter.GM crops & food · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Xavier CoumoulINSERM UMR-S1124, Toxicologie Pharmacologie et Signalisation Cellulaire, Université Paris Descartes, USPC, Paris, France.
Rémi ServienToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.
Ludmila JuricekINSERM UMR-S1124, Toxicologie Pharmacologie et Signalisation Cellulaire, Université Paris Descartes, USPC, Paris, France.
Yael Kaddouch-AmarINSERM UMR-S1124, Toxicologie Pharmacologie et Signalisation Cellulaire, Université Paris Descartes, USPC, Paris, France.
Yannick LippiToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.
Laureline BerthelotCentre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation (CRI), INSERM UMRS 1149, Paris, France.
Claire NayliesToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.
Marie-Line MorvanLaberca, ONIRIS, UMR INRA 1329, Nantes, France.
Jean-Philippe AntignacLaberca, ONIRIS, UMR INRA 1329, Nantes, France.
Christèle Desdoits-LethimonierInserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail), Université de Rennes, Rennes, France.
Bernard JegouInserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail), Université de Rennes, Rennes, France.
Marie Tremblay-FrancoToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.
Cécile CanletToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.
Laurent DebrauwerToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.
Caroline Le GallMethodomics, France.
Julie LaurentMethodomics, France.
Pierre-Antoine GouraudMethodomics, France.
Jean-Pierre CravediToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.
Elisabeth JeunesseToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.
Nicolas SavyInstitut de Mathématiques de Toulouse, UMR5219-Université de Toulouse, CNRS-UPS IMT, Toulouse, France.
Kadidiatou Dandere-AbdoulkarimToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.
Nathalie ArnichAnses, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Franck FourèsAnses, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Jérome CottonProfilomic, Saclay/Gif sur Yvette, France.
Simon BroudinProfilomic, Saclay/Gif sur Yvette, France.
Bruno CormanProfilomic, Saclay/Gif sur Yvette, France.
Annick MoingUMR1332 Biologie du Fruit et Pathologie, INRA, Université de Bordeaux, Villenave d'Ornon, France.
Bérengère LaporteToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.
Florence Richard-ForgetUR 1264, MycSA, INRA, Villenave d'Ornon, France.
Robert BaroukiINSERM UMR-S1124, Toxicologie Pharmacologie et Signalisation Cellulaire, Université Paris Descartes, USPC, Paris, France.
Peter RogowskyLaboratoire Reproduction et Développement des Plantes, CNRS, INRA, University Lyon, Lyon, France.
Bernard SallesToxalim (Research Centre in Food Toxicology), Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, INP-Purpan, UPS, Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The GMO90+ project was designed to identify biomarkers of exposure or health effects in Wistar Han RCC rats exposed in their diet to 2 genetically modified plants (GMP) and assess additional information with the use of metabolomic and transcriptomic techniques. Rats were fed for 6-months with 8 maize-based diets at 33% that comprised either MON810 (11% and 33%) or NK603 grains (11% and 33% with or without glyphosate treatment) or their corresponding near-isogenic controls. Extensive chemical and targeted analyses undertaken to assess each diet demonstrated that they could be used for the feeding trial. Rats were necropsied after 3 and 6 months. Based on the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development test guideline 408, the parameters tested showed a limited number of significant differences in pairwise comparisons, very few concerning GMP versus non-GMP. In such cases, no biological relevance could be established owing to the absence of difference in biologically linked variables, dose-response effects, or clinical disorders. No alteration of the reproduction function and kidney physiology was found. Metabolomics analyses on fluids (blood, urine) were performed after 3, 4.5, and 6 months. Transcriptomics analyses on organs (liver, kidney) were performed after 3 and 6 months. Again, among the significant differences in pairwise comparisons, no GMP effect was observed in contrast to that of maize variety and culture site. Indeed, based on transcriptomic and metabolomic data, we could differentiate MON- to NK-based diets. In conclusion, using this experimental design, no biomarkers of adverse health effect could be attributed to the consumption of GMP diets in comparison with the consumption of their near-isogenic non-GMP controls.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimalsConsumer Product SafetyEdible GrainFemaleFood, Genetically ModifiedMalePlants, Genetically ModifiedRatsRats, WistarToxicity TestsZea mays6-month rat feeding trialgenetically modified maizemetabolomicsMON810NK603OECD TG408transcriptomics

Identifiers

PMID30535037
PMCPMC6432862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.