ArticleInternational symposium on process systems engineering2018
Simultaneous Fault Detection and Identification in Continuous Processes via nonlinear Support Vector Machine based Feature Selection.
Article in International symposium on process systems engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industry 4.0: A Review on Challenges and Opportunities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Integrated Data-Driven Process Monitoring and Explicit Fault-Tolerant Multiparametric Control.Industrial & engineering chemistry research · 2020Article
- A Nonlinear Support Vector Machine-Based Feature Selection Approach for Fault Detection and Diagnosis: Application to the Tennessee Eastman Process.AIChE journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers · 2019Article
- Grouping of complex substances using analytical chemistry data: A framework for quantitative evaluation and visualization.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid detection and identification of process faults in industrial applications is crucial to sustain a safe and profitable operation. Today, the advances in sensor technologies have facilitated large amounts of chemical process data collection in real time which subsequently broadened the use of data-driven process monitoring techniques via machine learning and multivariate statistical analysis. One of the well-known machine learning techniques is Support Vector Machines (SVM) which allows the use of high dimensional feature sets for learning problems such as classification and regression. In this paper, we present the application of a novel nonlinear (kernel-dependent) SVM-based feature selection algorithm to process monitoring and fault detection of continuous processes. The developed methodology is derived from sensitivity analysis of the dual SVM objective and utilizes existing and novel greedy algorithms to rank features that also guides fault diagnosis. Specifically, we train fault-specific two-class SVM models to detect faulty operations, while using the feature selection algorithm to improve the accuracy of the fault detection models and perform fault diagnosis. We present results for the Tennessee Eastman process as a case study and compare our approach to existing approaches for fault detection, diagnosis and identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.