ArticleCommunications biology2018
Automated adherent cell elimination by a high-speed laser mediated by a light-responsive polymer.
Article in Communications biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Micropatterned neural induction with heat-inactivated extracellular matrix protein by on-demand high-speed laser.Regenerative therapy · 2026Article
- AI-guided laser purification of human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes for next-generation cardiac cell manufacturing.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence powers regenerative medicine into predictive realm.Regenerative medicine · 2024Review
- The use of artificial intelligence in induced pluripotent stem cell-based technology over 10-year period: A systematic scoping review.PloS one · 2024Article
- A live-cell image-based machine learning strategy for reducing variability in PSC differentiation systems.Cell discovery · 2023Article
- Downstream bioprocessing of human pluripotent stem cell-derived therapeutics.Engineering in life sciences · 2022Review
- A deep-learning-based workflow to deal with the defocusing problem in high-throughput experiments.Bioactive materials · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional cell handling and sorting methods require manual labor, which decreases both cell quality and quantity. To purify adherent cultured cells, cell purification technologies that are high throughput without dissociation and can be utilized in an on-demand manner are expected. Here, we developed a Laser-induced, Light-responsive-polymer-Activated, Cell Killing (LiLACK) system that enables high-speed and on-demand adherent cell sectioning and purification. This system employs a visible laser beam, which does not kill cells directly, but induces local heat production through the
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.