Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30534601›Full record

ArticleGlobal health research and policy2018

Health insurance and social capital in Ghana: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Christine J Fenenga, Katalin Buzasi, Daniel K Arhinful, Stephen K O Duku, Alice Ogink, Wouter Poortinga

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health research and policy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Christine J Fenenga *1Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Paasheuvelweg 24, 1105 BP Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4718-5949
Katalin Buzasi *1Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Paasheuvelweg 24, 1105 BP Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniel K Arhinful3Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Stephen K O Duku3Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Alice Ogink1Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Paasheuvelweg 24, 1105 BP Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wouter Poortinga6Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AT Wales, UK.
Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development · NLUniversity of Ghana · GHCardiff University · GBUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) was introduced in Ghana in 2003, enrolment is still far from the desired target of universal coverage. Low community engagement in the design and management of the system was identified as one of the main barriers. The aim of the current study was to explore the role of social capital in NHIS enrolment in two regions of Ghana, Western and Greater Accra.

methodsThe study involved a cluster-randomised controlled trial of 3246 clients of 64 healthcare facilities who completed both a baseline and a follow-up survey. Thirty-two facilities were randomly selected to receive two types of intervention. The remaining facilities served as control. The interventions were co-designed with stakeholders. Baseline and follow up surveys included measures of different types of social capital, as well as enrolment in the health insurance scheme.

resultsThe study found that the interventions encouraged NHIS enrolment (from 40.29 to 49.39% (intervention group) versus 36.49 to 36.75% (control group)). Secondly, certain types of social capital are associated with increased enrolment (log-odds ratios (

conclusionWe showed that the interventions helped to increase enrolment but that the positive effect was not realized by changes in social capital that we hypothesised based on result of the first phase of our study. Future research should aim to identify other community factors that are part of the enrolment process, whether other interventions to improve the quality of services could help to increase enrolment and, as a result, could provide community benefits in terms of social capital.Our findings can guide the NHIS in Ghana and other health organizations to enhance enrolment.

trial registrationEthical Clearance by Ghana Health Service Ethical Committee No. GHS-ERC 08.5.11.

Indexed as

Cluster randomised controlled trialGhanaHealth insuranceMarginal effectsSocial capitalSystematic client engagement

Identifiers

PMID30534601
PMCPMC6282266
OpenAlexW2902380013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.