Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30534595›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2018

Retransplantation Outcomes at a Large Lung Transplantation Program.

Dewei Ren, Thomas S Kaleekal, Edward A Graviss, Duc T Nguyen, Neeraj Sinha, Amad Goodarzi, Isioma Agboli, Erik E Suarez, Matthias Loebe, Scott A Scheinin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Textbook outcome in lung transplantation: Planned venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation versus off-pump support for patients without pulmonary hypertension.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2022
    Article
  7. Lung retransplantation in the modern era.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021
    Review
  8. Consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: An update from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2021
    Article
  9. Lung retransplantation for chronic lung allograft dysfunction.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dewei RenDeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.
Thomas S KaleekalPulmonary and Critical Care, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.
Edward A GravissDepartment of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX.
Duc T NguyenDepartment of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX.
Neeraj SinhaMiami Transplant Institute, Memorial Jackson Health System, University of Miami, Miami, FL.
Amad GoodarziPulmonary and Critical Care, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.
Isioma AgboliHouston Methodist J.C. Walter Jr. Transplant Center, Houston, TX.
Erik E SuarezDeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.
Matthias LoebeMiami Transplant Institute, Memorial Jackson Health System, University of Miami, Miami, FL.
Scott A ScheininDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Brian A BrucknerDeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.
Houston Methodist · USMethodist Hospital · USMontefiore Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the increase of primary lung transplantation across major centers worldwide, over the last several years the need of lung retransplant (ReTX) is likely to increase. Therefore, characterization of ReTX patients is prudent and necessary. Our study aimed to investigate and characterize the covariates and outcomes associated with lung ReTX survival in a single large U.S. transplant center.

methodsDemographic, clinical diagnoses, and comorbidities were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier statistics were used to calculate and predict survival for 30 days and up to 3 years. Cox proportional modeling was used to determine the variables associated with mortality.

resultsOf included 684 lung transplants performed at the Houston Methodist Hospital between January 2009 and December 2015, 49 were lung ReTX. Median age of primary lung transplant (non-ReTX) and ReTx recipients was 62 and 49 years, respectively. Chronic graft rejection in the form of restrictive chronic lung allograft dysfunction and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome was the main indications for ReTX. Compared with non-ReTX patients, ReTX patients had higher median lung allocation score (46.2 vs 37.0, respectively) and higher mortality after 6 months posttransplant. ReTX, older age, female sex, hospitalization 15 days or longer, estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60, 6-minute walk distance less than 400 ft, and donor/recipient height ratio less than 1 were significantly associated with decreased 1-year patient and graft survival. Chronic graft rejection was still the major cause of death in the long-term follow-up recipients.

conclusionsOur findings suggested that lung ReTX recipients have poor long-term survival outcomes. Lung ReTX should only be offered to carefully selected patients.

Identifiers

PMID30534595
PMCPMC6233659
OpenAlexW2898343254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.