Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30534267›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiology cases2015

Enhanced stent visualization systems during PCI: A case series and review of literature.

Simone Biscaglia, Carlo Tumscitz, Matteo Tebaldi, Elisa Andrenacci, Rita Pavasini, Gianluca Campo, Roberto Ferrari

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiology cases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating the Impact of Enhanced Stent Visualization on PCI Outcomes in Older Patients With Multivessel Disease.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A patient with an hourglass shaped fractured coronary stent.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simone BiscagliaCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S.Anna, Cona FE, Italy.
Carlo TumscitzCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S.Anna, Cona FE, Italy.
Matteo TebaldiCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S.Anna, Cona FE, Italy.
Elisa AndrenacciCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S.Anna, Cona FE, Italy.
Rita PavasiniCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S.Anna, Cona FE, Italy.
Gianluca CampoCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S.Anna, Cona FE, Italy.
Roberto FerrariCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S.Anna, Cona FE, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhanced stent visualization systems increase the amount and quality of information during percutaneous coronary interventions. When compared to imaging techniques such as intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography, enhanced stent visualization systems are easy-to-use, as well as time and cost saving. They are useful during stent implantation, overlap, assessment of integrity, and expansion. We review the available data regarding enhanced stent visualization systems and we report 5 cases showing their current applications during percutaneous coronary interventions. <

Indexed as

Complex percutaneous coronary interventionEnhanced stent visualization systemIntravascular ultrasoundOptical coherence tomographyStent fracture

Identifiers

PMID30534267
PMCPMC6279651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.