ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018
Accounting for Individual Differences in Decision-Making Competence: Personality and Gender Differences.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural correlates of belief change in political and non-political domains among left-wing individuals confronted with counterarguments.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Measures of healthcare decision-making ability in cognitive aging: a scoping review from the Advancing Reliable Measurement in Cognitive Aging and Decision-Making Ability (ARMCADA) research initiative.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- When personality meets surprise: individual differences in memory for unexpected events.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Differential pathways from personality to risk-taking: how extraversion and negative emotionality shape decision-making through overconfidence.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Late-life psychiatric factors and life satisfaction are associated with cognitive errors: evidence from an experimental module of a large-scale survey in India.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Actively Open-Minded Thinking and Its Measurement.Journal of Intelligence · 2023Article
- The heuristics-and-biases inventory: An open-source tool to explore individual differences in rationality.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- The Theoretical Model of Decision-Making Behaviour Geospatial Analysis Using Data Obtained from the Games of Chess.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- The association between decision-making skills and subjective decision outcomes among administrative officers in the Swedish Social Insurance Agency.Health & social care in the community · 2021Article
- Elaborating on the longitudinal measurement invariance and construct validity of the triarchic psychopathy scales from the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire.Psychological assessment · 2021Article
- Cognitive Bias and the Extraversion Personality Shaping the Behavior of Investors.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Financial decision-making in a community sample of adults with and without current symptoms of ADHD.PloS one · 2020Article
- Factors that influence occupational physicians' decision to issue an employer warning in Japan.Journal of occupational health · 2020Article
- The Effect of Response Inhibition Training on Risky Decision-Making Task Performance.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- The Fatalistic Decision Maker: Time Perspective, Working Memory, and Older Adults' Decision-Making Competence.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging research has highlighted the utility of measuring individual differences in decision-making competence (DMC), showing that consistently following normatively rational principles is associated with positive psychosocial and health behaviors. From another level of analysis, functional theories of personality suggest that broad trait dimensions represent variation in underlying self-regulatory systems, providing a mechanistic account for robust associations between traits and similar life outcomes. Yet, the degree to which broad dispositional personality dimensions predict global tendencies to respond rationally is less understood. In a large online community sample (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.