Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30534095›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018

What Does the

Patrick D Gajewski, Eva Hanisch, Michael Falkenstein, Sven Thönes, Edmund Wascher

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05155397 (The Dortmund Vital Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05155397 active not recruitingnot on this map

The Dortmund Vital Study: Impact of Biological and Lifestyle Factors on Cognitive Performace and Work Ability Across the Lifespan. An Interdisciplinary, Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Study

TypeobservationalSponsorTechnical University of DortmundRan2016 to 2037Enrolled627ConditionsAge-related Cognitive Decline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cognitive correlates of human endurance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Impaired neurovascular coupling in metabolic syndrome: an fNIRS study.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick D GajewskiDepartment of Ergonomics, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Technical University of Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Eva HanischDepartment of Psychology, Technical University of Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Michael FalkensteinInstitute for Working, Learning and Aging, Bochum, Germany.
Sven ThönesDepartment of Ergonomics, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Technical University of Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Edmund WascherDepartment of Ergonomics, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Technical University of Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
TU Dortmund University · DELeibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory (WM) declines with increasing age. The WM capacity is often measured by means of the computerized version of the

Indexed as

agingattentioncognitive functionsn-backstroop interferenceverbal memoryworking memory

Identifiers

PMID30534095
PMCPMC6275471
OpenAlexW2902771924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.