Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30533685›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology resource announcements2018

Genome Sequences of Five African Swine Fever Virus Genotype IX Isolates from Domestic Pigs in Uganda.

Charles Masembe, Vattipally B Sreenu, Ana Da Silva Filipe, Gavin S Wilkie, Peter Ogweng, Francis Johnson Mayega, Vincent B Muwanika, Roman Biek, Massimo Palmarini, Andrew J Davison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology resource announcements, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Viruses · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Charles Masembe *College of Natural Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9581-0414
Vattipally B Sreenu *MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Ana Da Silva FilipeMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Gavin S WilkieMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Peter OgwengCollege of Natural Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Francis Johnson MayegaCollege of Natural Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Vincent B MuwanikaCollege of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Roman BiekInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Massimo PalmariniMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Andrew J DavisonMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12014/12Medical Research Council MC_UU_12014/3Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complete genome sequences of five African swine fever virus isolates were determined directly from clinical material obtained from domestic pigs in Uganda. Four sequences were essentially identical to each other, and all were closely related to the only known genome sequence of p72 genotype IX.

Identifiers

PMID30533685
PMCPMC6256554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.