Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30533595›Full record

ArticleJB & JS open access2018

Culture-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infection: An Update on What to Expect.

Timothy L Tan, Michael M Kheir, Noam Shohat, Dean D Tan, Matthew Kheir, Chilung Chen, Javad Parvizi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JB & JS open access, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06670885 (Innovative Molecular Approaches for the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infections), which is not on this map. Cited by 98 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06670885 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Innovative Molecular Approaches for the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infections

TypeobservationalSponsorI.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'AmbrogioRan2024 to 2027Enrolled70ConditionsProsthetic Joint Infection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Timothy L TanRothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Michael M KheirRothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Noam ShohatRothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Dean D TanRothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Matthew KheirRothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Chilung ChenRothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Javad ParviziRothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCulture-negative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a challenging condition to treat. The most appropriate management of culture-negative PJI is not known, and there is immense variability in the treatment outcome of this condition. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the characteristics, outcomes, and risk factors for failure of treatment of culture-negative PJI.

methodsA retrospective review of 219 patients (138 hips and 81 knees) who had undergone surgery for the treatment of culture-negative PJI was performed utilizing a prospectively collected institutional PJI database. PJIs for which the results of culture were unavailable were excluded. An electronic query and manual review of the medical records were completed to obtain patient demographics, treatment, microbiology data, comorbidities, and other surgical characteristics. Treatment failure was assessed using the Delphi consensus criteria.

resultsThe prevalence of suspected culture-negative PJI was 22.0% (219 of 996), and the prevalence of culture-negative PJI as defined by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) was 6.4% (44 of 688). Overall, the rate of treatment success was 69.2% (110 of 159) in patients with >1 year of follow-up. Of the 49 culture-negative PJIs for which treatment failed, 26 (53.1%) subsequently had positive cultures; of those 26, 10 (38.5%) were positive for methicillin-sensitive

conclusionsThe present study demonstrates that culture-negative PJI is a relatively frequent finding with unacceptable rates of treatment failure. Every effort should be made to isolate the infecting organism prior to surgical intervention, including extending the incubation period for cultures, withholding antibiotics prior to obtaining culture specimens, and possibly using newly introduced molecular techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Identifiers

PMID30533595
PMCPMC6242327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.