ArticleTurkish journal of emergency medicine2018
Evaluation of volume status in a prehospital setting by ultrasonographic measurement of inferior vena cava and aorta diameters.
Article in Turkish journal of emergency medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Different preoperative fluids do not affect the hemodynamic status but gastric volume: results of a randomized crossover pilot study.BMC anesthesiology · 2022Trial
- [Recommendations for Education in Sonography in Prehospital Emergency Medicine (pPOCUS): Consensus paper of DGINA, DGAI, BAND, BV-ÄLRD, DGU, DIVI and DGIIN].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2023Review
- [Recommendations for Education in Sonography in Prehospital Emergency Medicine (pPOCUS): Consensus paper of DGINA, DGAI, BAND, BV-ÄLRD, DGU, DIVI and DGIIN].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2023Review
- Role of Point-of-Care Diagnostics in Lower- and Middle-Income Countries and Austere Environments.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Sonographic Estimation Rather Than Quantification of Fluid Status Using Inferior Vena Cava and Other Major Vessel Parameters in a Non-Bleeding Fluid Loss and Centralization Model.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of ultrasonographic measurement of the diameter of the inferior vena cava (IVCD) and abdominal aorta (AAD) for assessing volume status. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis was a prospective, observational study. A total of 23 volunteers participated in the study. Each participant was selected randomly. All participants completed the 2016 Kaunas Marathon. Participants filed out a brief survey about their fluid intake (in standardised glasses) in the 24 h before the race and during the race. Participants underwent ultrasound measurements 10-40 min before the start of the race and 3-15 min after finishing the race. To visualize respiratory variation, M-mode was used, with the beam crossing the IVCD 2 cm from the right atrium. The AAD was measured 1 cm above the celiac trunk. IVCD in expiration (IVCDexp)/AAD was calculated by dividing the value of IVCDexp by the value of AAD. The findings were compared with difference in body mass index.
resultsThe mean weight lost after the marathon was 2.93 kg (
conclusionUltrasonographic assessment of IVCDexp could be useful in the evaluation of volume status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.