Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30533197›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

Glutathione/pH-responsive nanosponges enhance strigolactone delivery to prostate cancer cells.

Monica Argenziano, Chiara Lombardi, Benedetta Ferrara, Francesco Trotta, Fabrizio Caldera, Marco Blangetti, Hinanit Koltai, Yoram Kapulnik, Ronit Yarden, Luca Gigliotti and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Conventional Nanosized Drug Delivery Systems for Cancer Applications.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Monica ArgenzianoDepartment of Drug Science and Technology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Chiara LombardiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Benedetta FerraraDepartment of Drug Science and Technology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Francesco TrottaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Fabrizio CalderaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Marco BlangettiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Hinanit KoltaiAgricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Rishon LeTsiyon, Israel.
Yoram KapulnikAgricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Rishon LeTsiyon, Israel.
Ronit YardenGeorgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, USA.
Luca GigliottiDepartment of Health Sciences, Universita del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
Umberto DianzaniDepartment of Health Sciences, Universita del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
Chiara DianzaniDepartment of Drug Science and Technology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Cristina PrandiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Roberta CavalliDepartment of Drug Science and Technology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · ITAgricultural Research Organization · ILUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITGeorgetown University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strigolactones (SLs) are carotenoid-derived plant hormones that exhibit anti-cancer activities. We previously demonstrated that two SL analogues, MEB55 and ST362, inhibit the growth and survival of various cancer cell lines. However, these compounds have low aqueous solubility and stability at physiological pH. Here, we generated SL-loaded glutathione/pH-responsive nanosponges (GSH/pH-NS) to selectively deliver SLs to prostate cancer cells and enhance their therapeutic efficacy. The SLs were readily incorporated into the GSH/pH-NS. The drug loading efficiency was 13.9% for MEB55 and 15.4% for ST362, and the encapsulation efficiency was 88.7% and 96.5%, respectively. Kinetic analysis revealed that release of MEB55 and ST362 from the GSH/pH-NS was accelerated at acidic pH and in the presence of a high GSH concentration. Evaluation of the effects of MEB55- and ST362-loaded GSH/pH-NS on the growth of DU145 (high GSH) and PC-3 (low GSH) prostate cancer cells revealed that the GSH/pH-NS inhibited the proliferation of DU145 cells to a greater extent than free MEB55 or ST362 over a range of concentrations. These findings indicate GSH/pH-NS are efficient tools for controlled delivery of SLs to prostate cancer cells and may enhance the therapeutic efficacy of these compounds.

Indexed as

controlled releaseGSH/pH-responsive nanospongesintracellular deliveryprostate cancer cellsstrigolactones

Identifiers

PMID30533197
PMCPMC6254672
OpenAlexW2899910825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.