Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30533027›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Analysis of bone osteometry, mineralization, mechanical and histomorphometrical properties of tibiotarsus in broiler chickens demonstrates a influence of dietary chickpea seeds (Cicer arietinum L.) inclusion as a primary protein source.

Siemowit Muszyński, Ewa Tomaszewska, Piotr Dobrowolski, Małgorzata Kwiecień, Dariusz Wiącek, Izabela Świetlicka, Małgorzata Skibińska, Monika Szymańska-Chargot, Jolanta Orzeł, Michał Świetlicki and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Impact of Hempseed Consumption on Bone Parameters and Body Composition in Growing Female C57BL/6 Mice.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Raw Chickpea (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effects of Yeast (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Siemowit MuszyńskiDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Life Sciences, Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4118-6302
Ewa TomaszewskaDepartment of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Piotr DobrowolskiDepartment of Comparative Anatomy and Anthropology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland.
Małgorzata KwiecieńInstitute of Animal Nutrition and Bromathology, Faculty of Biology, Animal Science and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Dariusz WiącekBohdan Dobrzański Institute of Agrophysics of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland.
Izabela ŚwietlickaDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Life Sciences, Lublin, Poland.
Małgorzata SkibińskaDepartment of Crystallography, Faculty of Chemistry, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland.
Monika Szymańska-ChargotBohdan Dobrzański Institute of Agrophysics of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland.
Jolanta OrzełDepartment of Radiochemistry and Colloid Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland.
Michał ŚwietlickiDepartment of Applied Physics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, Lublin, Poland.
Marta ArczewskaDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Life Sciences, Lublin, Poland.
Mariusz SzymanekDepartment of Agricultural, Horticultural and Forest Machinery, Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Mykola ZhylaLaboratory of Clinical Biological Research, State Scientific Research Control Institute of Veterinary Medicinal Products and Feed Additives, Lviv, Ukraine.
Monika Hułas-StasiakDepartment of Comparative Anatomy and Anthropology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland.
Halyna RudykLaboratory of Clinical Biological Research, State Scientific Research Control Institute of Veterinary Medicinal Products and Feed Additives, Lviv, Ukraine.
Agnieszka Tomczyk-WarunekDepartment of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
University of Life Sciences in Lublin · PLMaria Curie-Skłodowska University · PLInstitute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLSCIVP of Veterinary Medicinal Products and Feed Additives · UALublin University of Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was focused on analyzing the effects of dietary inclusion of raw chickpea seed as a replacement of soybean meal as a primary protein source on bone structure in broiler chickens. Broiler chickens (n = 160) received in their diet either soybean meal (SBM) or raw chickpea seeds (CPS) as a primary protein source throughout the whole rearing period (n = 80 in each group). On the 42th day randomly selected chickens from each group (n = 8) were slaughtered. Collected tibiotarsus were subjected to examination of the biomechanical characteristics of bone mid-diaphysis, microstructure of the growth plate and articular cartilages; the analysis of mineral content and crystallinity of mineral phase, and the measurements of thermal stability of collagen in hyaline cartilage were also carried out. The inclusion of chickpea seeds resulted in increase of bone osteometric parameters (weight, length and mid-diaphysis cross-sectional area) and mechanical endurance (yield load, ultimate load, stiffness, Young modulus). However, when loads were adjusted to bone shape (yield and ultimate stress) both groups did not differ. Mineral density determined by means of densitometric measurements did not differ between groups, however the detailed analysis revealed the differences in the macro- and microelements composition. The results of FT-IR and XRD analyses showed no effect of diet type on mineral phase crystallinity and hydroxyapatite nanocrystallites size. In trabecular bone, the increase of real bone volume (BV/TV) and number of trabeculae was observed in the CPS group. Total thickness of articular cartilage was the same in both groups, save the transitional zone, which was thicker in the SBM group. The total thickness of the growth plate cartilage was significantly increased in the CPS group. The area of the most intense presence of proteoglycans was wider in the SBM group. The structural analysis of fibrous components of bone revealed the increase of fraction of thin, immature collagen content in articular cartilage, trabeculae and compact bone in the CPS group. The dietary inclusion of CPS affected the thermal stability of collagen, as decrease of net denaturation enthalpy was observed. This study showed a beneficial effect of CPS on the skeletal development, improving the overall bone development and the microarchitecture of cancellous bone. It suggests that CPS can be a promising replacement for SBM in broilers feeding in the aspect of animal welfare related to the development of the skeletal system.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBody WeightBone and BonesBone DevelopmentCalcification, PhysiologicChickensCicerDietDietary ProteinsSeedsSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredDietary Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30533027
PMCPMC6289425
OpenAlexW2904098752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.