Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30533000›Full record

ArticleEndocrine connections2018

Pharmacokinetic interaction between mitotane and etoposide in adrenal carcinoma: a pilot study.

Anne Jouinot, Bernard Royer, Etienne Chatelut, Sotheara Moeung, Guillaume Assié, Audrey Thomas-Schoemann, Jérôme Bertherat, François Goldwasser, Benoit Blanchet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine connections, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Herb-drug interaction in the protective effect ofJournal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Anne JouinotDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, CARPEM, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Bernard RoyerCHU Besançon, Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Dpt, Besançon cedex, France.
Etienne ChatelutInstitut Claudius-Regaud, Université de Toulouse, INSERM, Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Sotheara MoeungInstitut Claudius-Regaud, Université de Toulouse, INSERM, Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Guillaume AssiéInstitut Cochin, INSERM U1016, CNRS UMR8104, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Audrey Thomas-SchoemannDepartment of Pharmacy, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Jérôme BertheratInstitut Cochin, INSERM U1016, CNRS UMR8104, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
François GoldwasserDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, CARPEM, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Benoit BlanchetPharmacokinetics and Pharmacochemistry Unit, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Hôpital Cochin · FRInstitut Cochin · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Toulouse · FRInstitut Claudius Regaud · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The combination of mitotane and platinum-etoposide chemotherapy is a front-line treatment in metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), although this regimen shows limited efficacy. Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between mitotane, a strong CYP3A4 inducer, and etoposide, which is a substrate of CYP3A4, may contribute to chemoresistance. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the pharmacokinetic interaction between mitotane and etoposide in ACC patients. Methods Five consecutive ACC patients treated with platinum etoposide (120-150 mg/m2 day 1-2-3 at cycle 1), with or without concomitant mitotane, were included. In the absence of limiting toxicity, a dose escalation of etoposide was proposed since cycle 2. Plasma etoposide concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography at 0, 4 and 24 h after each infusion. Clearance and area under the curve (AUC) of etoposide were determined at each cycle. Results Patients received two to six chemotherapy cycles, in association with mitotane (N = 4) or after mitotane discontinuation (N = 1). Etoposide clearance was two-fold higher with concomitant mitotane (4.95 L/h) than after mitotane discontinuation (2.53 L/h, P = 0.014), and 2.5-fold higher than that in reference population not treated with mitotane (1.81 L/h). Etoposide dose escalation was performed in four patients under mitotane, resulting in two minor tumor responses and one severe toxicity (febrile aplasia) at dose of 300 mg/m2/day. Tumor response was associated with higher etoposide AUC (267.3 vs 188.8 mg.h/L, P = 0.04). Conclusion A drug-drug interaction between mitotane and etoposide may contribute to the low efficacy of platinum-etoposide chemotherapy. This pilot study suggests further a potential benefit of increasing etoposide dose in ACC patients receiving mitotane.

Indexed as

adrenocortical carcinomadrug interactionetoposidemitotanepharmacology

Identifiers

PMID30533000
PMCPMC6301193
OpenAlexW2904683944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.