Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30532625›Full record

ArticleMycoKeys2018

Identification of endophytic fungi from leaves of Pandanaceae based on their morphotypes and DNA sequence data from southern Thailand.

Saowaluck Tibpromma, Kevin D Hyde, Jayarama D Bhat, Peter E Mortimer, Jianchu Xu, Itthayakorn Promputtha, Mingkwan Doilom, Jun-Bo Yang, Alvin M C Tang, Samantha C Karunarathna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MycoKeys, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MycoKeys · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Discoveries ofIMA fungus · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. New Species ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Re-EvaluatingJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Endophytic Fungi Associated withJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Saowaluck TibprommaKey Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Kevin D HydeKey Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Jayarama D BhatFormerly, Department of Botany, Goa University, Taleigão, Goa, India.
Peter E MortimerKey Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Jianchu XuKey Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Itthayakorn PromputthaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Mingkwan DoilomKey Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Jun-Bo YangGermplasm Bank of Wild Species in Southwest China, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China.
Alvin M C TangDivision of Applied Science, College of International Education, The Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Samantha C KarunarathnaKey Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The authors established the taxonomic status of endophytic fungi associated with leaves of Pandanaceae collected from southern Thailand. Morphotypes were initially identified based on their characteristics in culture and species level identification was done based on both morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analyses of DNA sequence data. Twenty-two isolates from healthy leaves were categorised into eight morphotypes. Appropriate universal primers were used to amplify specific gene regions and phylogenetic analyses were performed to identify these endophytes and established relationships with extant fungi. The authors identified both ascomycete and basidiomycete species, including one new genus, seven new species and nine known species. Morphological descriptions, colour plates and phylogenies are given for each taxon.

Indexed as

AscomycetesBasidiomycotabiodiversityphylogenetic analysis

Identifiers

PMID30532625
PMCPMC6283267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.