Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30532605›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2018

Progress and challenges in improving maternal health in the Tibet Autonomous Region, China.

Labasangzhu, E Bjertness, E B McNeil, Deji, Y Guo, P Songwathana, V Chongsuvivatwong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

LabasangzhuDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Tibet University Medical College, Lhasa, Tibet, China.
E BjertnessDepartment of Community Medicine and Global Health, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
E B McNeilEpidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand, cvirasak@gmail.com.
DejiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Tibet University Medical College, Lhasa, Tibet, China.
Y GuoDepartment of Health Policies and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University Health and Science Center, Beijing, China.
P SongwathanaDepartment of Adult and Elderly Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand.
V ChongsuvivatwongEpidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand, cvirasak@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe maternal mortality ratio (MMR) of the Tibet Autonomous Region (hereinafter "Tibet") is still five times higher than the national average. This study aims to identify the successes and pitfalls of the health system that might be related to the high mortality rate based on the WHO health system building blocks, focusing on human resources for health and health infrastructure and the impact on maternal health and outcomes.

methodsSources of information include China's central government and Tibet's local government policies and regulations, health statistical yearbooks, maternal and child health routine reporting system, and English and Chinese online research articles. Joinpoint analysis was applied for MMR and maternal health service trends, and correlation test was used to test the relationship between maternal health services and outcomes.

resultsBetween 2000 and 2015, public health spending in Tibet increased 67-fold, the hospital delivery rate increased 70.1%, and the MMR dropped from 466.9 to 100.1 per 100,000 live births. However, the total number of health workers, qualified medical doctors, and registered nurses per 1,000 people were 4.4, 1.4, and 1.0, respectively, much lower than the national average (5.8, 1.8, and 2.4). In Tibet, there were 80 basic and 16 comprehensive emergency obstetric care (EOC) centers. On average, there were 12 basic and 2.5 comprehensive EOC centers per 500,000 of the population. Though it met the WHO's recommendation, it might remain inadequate in the low population density of the area like Tibet.

conclusionThe shortage of health professionals and EOC centers and health information in predominantly remote rural areas with a scattered population still needs to be rectified.

Indexed as

emergency obstetric carehealth systemhuman resources for healthTibet

Identifiers

PMID30532605
PMCPMC6241686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.