Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30532592›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2018

Comparison of gene expression in liver regeneration and hepatocellular carcinoma formation.

Li Yin, Yahao Wang, Xueqiang Guo, Cunshuan Xu, Guoying Yu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Down-regulation of TP53 is a highlighted molecular event in gastric ulcer.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2022
    Article
  4. Genetic and Cellular Contributions to Liver Regeneration.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2021
    Article
  5. Transcriptional and epigenetic landscape of CaJournal of cell communication and signaling · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li YinCollege of Life Science, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, Henan 453007, China, cellkeylab@126.com; guoyingyu@htu.edu.cn.
Yahao WangCollege of Life Science, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, Henan 453007, China, cellkeylab@126.com; guoyingyu@htu.edu.cn.
Xueqiang GuoCollege of Life Science, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, Henan 453007, China, cellkeylab@126.com; guoyingyu@htu.edu.cn.
Cunshuan XuCollege of Life Science, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, Henan 453007, China, cellkeylab@126.com; guoyingyu@htu.edu.cn.
Guoying YuCollege of Life Science, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, Henan 453007, China, cellkeylab@126.com; guoyingyu@htu.edu.cn.
Henan Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiver -cell proliferation occurs in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver regeneration (LR). The development and progression of HCC and LR have many similar molecular pathways with very different results. In simple terms, LR is a controllable process of organ recovery and function reconstruction, whereas liver cancer is uncontrollable. Do they share common key pathways and genes?

methodsIn this study, the dynamic transcriptome profile at ten time points (0, 2, 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 72, 120, and 168 hours) during LR in rats after two-thirds hepatectomy and eight stages (normal, cirrhosis without HCC, cirrhosis, low-grade dysplastic, high-grade dysplastic, and very early, early advanced, and very advanced HCC) representing a stepwise carcinogenic process from preneoplastic lesions to end-stage HCC were analyzed in detail. A variety of bioinformatic methods, including MaSigPro, weighted gene-coexpression network analysis, and spatial analysis of functional enrichment, were used to analyze, elucidate, and compare similarities and differences between LR and HCC formation.

resultsKey biological processes and genes were identified. From the comparison, we found that cell proliferation and angiogenesis were the most significantly dysregulated processes shared by LR and HCC. The pattern of cell-proliferation-related gene expression in progression stage during LR is similar to the transition process from dysplasia to early-stage HCC. LR and HCC showed different expression patterns as a whole. Some key genes, including

conclusionThese findings could contribute to revealing the molecular mechanism of development and regulation mechanism of normal and abnormal proliferation, which could provide new ideas and treatment methods for regenerative medicine, oncological drug development, and oncological treatment.

Indexed as

angiogenesisFYNhepatocellular carcinomaliver regenerationMaSigPromicroarray

Identifiers

PMID30532592
PMCPMC6245377
OpenAlexW2900504587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.