Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30532321›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2018

A comparative evaluation of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, I-gel and Supreme laryngeal mask airway in adult patients undergoing elective surgery: A randomised trial.

Anisha Singh, Anju R Bhalotra, Raktima Anand

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06914453 (A Comparative Study of Air-Q3 and Ambu AuraGain Supraglottic Airway Device in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery Under General Anaesthesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06914453 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Comparative Study of Air-Q3 and Ambu AuraGain Supraglottic Airway Device in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery Under General Anaesthesia: A Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MalayaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled90ConditionsOropharyngeal Leak Pressure, Supraglottic Airway, Elective Surgery, General AnaesthesiaArmsAir Q-3 Supraglottic Airway Device, Ambu AuraGain Supraglottic Airway Device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anisha SinghDepartment of Anesthesia, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Anju R BhalotraDepartment of Anesthesia, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Raktima AnandDepartment of Anesthesia, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsSecond-generation supraglottic airway devices are widely used in current anaesthesia practice. This randomised study was undertaken to evaluate and compare laryngeal mask airway: ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA), Supreme laryngeal mask airway (SLMA) and I-gel.

methodsEighty-four adult patients undergoing elective surgery were randomly allocated to three groups: group

resultsThe demographic profile of patients was comparable. OLP measured after insertion, 30 minutes later and at the end of surgery differed significantly between the three groups (

conclusionPLMA provides better sealing pressure but takes longer to insert. I-gel and SLMA have similar sealing pressures. I-gel insertion time is quicker.

Indexed as

Anaesthesialaryngeal masktimeventilation

Identifiers

PMID30532321
PMCPMC6236799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.