ArticlePLoS computational biology2018
Predicting protein targets for drug-like compounds using transcriptomics.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drug target prediction from perturbation transcriptomics via a biological function-guided hypergraph siamese network.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Harnessing AI to fuse phenotypic signatures for drug target identification: progress in computational modeling.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Exploiting artificial intelligence in precision oncology: an updated comprehensive review.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Cell-type-agnostic differential gene expression uncovers conserved principles of cellular regulation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Discovery of Small-Molecule Ligands for the E3 Ligase STUB1/CHIP from a DNA-Encoded Library Screen.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2025Article
- Article
- Systematic computational strategies for identifying protein targets and lead discovery.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- Deep representation learning of chemical-induced transcriptional profile for phenotype-based drug discovery.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Towards Precision Ecotoxicology: Leveraging Evolutionary Conservation of Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Product Targets to Understand Adverse Outcomes Across Species and Life Stages.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2024Review
- Drug target prediction through deep learning functional representation of gene signatures.Nature communications · 2024Article
- An overview of recent advances and challenges in predicting compound-protein interaction (CPI).Medical review (2021) · 2023Review
- On the correspondence between the transcriptomic response of a compound and its effects on its targets.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Benchmarking causal reasoning algorithms for gene expression-based compound mechanism of action analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Mechanism of action deconvolution of the small-molecule pathological tau aggregation inhibitor Anle138b.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2023Article
- How to Design Peptides.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Navigating Transcriptomic Connectivity Mapping Workflows to Link Chemicals with Bioactivities.Chemical research in toxicology · 2022Review
- RNA aptamers specific for transmembrane p24 trafficking protein 6 and Clusterin for the targeted delivery of imaging reagents and RNA therapeutics to human β cells.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Drug target inference by mining transcriptional data using a novel graph convolutional network framework.Protein & cell · 2022Article
- Recent Advances in Cancer Drug Discovery Through the Use of Phenotypic Reporter Systems, Connectivity Mapping, and Pooled CRISPR Screening.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Computational tools for analyzing single-cell data in pluripotent cell differentiation studies.Cell reports methods · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An expanded chemical space is essential for improved identification of small molecules for emerging therapeutic targets. However, the identification of targets for novel compounds is biased towards the synthesis of known scaffolds that bind familiar protein families, limiting the exploration of chemical space. To change this paradigm, we validated a new pipeline that identifies small molecule-protein interactions and works even for compounds lacking similarity to known drugs. Based on differential mRNA profiles in multiple cell types exposed to drugs and in which gene knockdowns (KD) were conducted, we showed that drugs induce gene regulatory networks that correlate with those produced after silencing protein-coding genes. Next, we applied supervised machine learning to exploit drug-KD signature correlations and enriched our predictions using an orthogonal structure-based screen. As a proof-of-principle for this regimen, top-10/top-100 target prediction accuracies of 26% and 41%, respectively, were achieved on a validation of set 152 FDA-approved drugs and 3104 potential targets. We then predicted targets for 1680 compounds and validated chemical interactors with four targets that have proven difficult to chemically modulate, including non-covalent inhibitors of HRAS and KRAS. Importantly, drug-target interactions manifest as gene expression correlations between drug treatment and both target gene KD and KD of genes that act up- or down-stream of the target, even for relatively weak binders. These correlations provide new insights on the cellular response of disrupting protein interactions and highlight the complex genetic phenotypes of drug treatment. With further refinement, our pipeline may accelerate the identification and development of novel chemical classes by screening compound-target interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.