Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30532235›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Users' preferences and design recommendations to promote engagements with mobile apps for diabetes self-management: Multi-national perspectives.

Mary D Adu, Usman H Malabu, Aduli E O Malau-Aduli, Bunmi S Malau-Aduli

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05958602 (Improving Recruitment and Retention for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support by Bridging Clinical-Community Linkages and Supplemental Diabetes Education Technology), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05958602 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Improving Recruitment and Retention for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support by Bridging Clinical-Community Linkages and Supplemental Diabetes Education Technology: A Socio-Ecological Approach

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedsPLUS ConsultingRan2024 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsDiabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsTechnology, Standard DSMES Only, Traditional Recruitment Methods, CHW-Led Recruitment Methods
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Efficacy ofDiabetes technology & therapeutics · 2020
    Trial
  7. Factors Affecting Telehealth Consultation in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Scoping Review.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mary D AduCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0046-9215
Usman H MalabuCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
Aduli E O Malau-AduliCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
Bunmi S Malau-AduliCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile phone applications (apps) offer motivation and support for self-management of diabetes mellitus (DM), but their use is limited by high attrition due to insufficient consideration of end-users perspectives and usability requirements. This study aimed to examine app usage and feature preferences among people with DM, and explore their recommendations for future inclusions to foster engagement with diabetes apps.

methodsThe study was conducted internationally on adults with type 1 or type 2 DM using online questionnaire (quantitative) to investigate usage and preferences for app features that support diabetes self-management and semi structured telephone interview (qualitative) to explore suggestions on fostering engagement and specific educational information for inclusion into diabetes apps. Survey and interview data were analysed using descriptive/ inferential statistics and inductive thematic analysis respectively.

resultsA total of 217 respondents with type 1 DM (38.25%) or type 2 DM (61.8%), from 4 continents (Australia, Europe, Asia and America) participated in the survey. About half of the respondents (48%) use apps, mainly with features for tracking blood glucose (56.6%), blood pressure (51.9%) and food calories (48.1%). Preferred features in future apps include nutrient values of foods (56.7%), blood glucose (54.8%), physical exercise tracker (47%), health data analytics (42.9%) and education on diabetes self-management (40.6%). Irrespective of the type of DM, participants proposed future apps that are user friendly, support healthy eating, provide actionable reminders and consolidate data across peripheral health devices. Participants with type 1 DM recommended customised features with news update on developments in the field of diabetes. Nominated specific educational topics included tips on problem solving, use of insulin pump therapy, signs of diabetes complication and transitioning from paediatric into adult care.

conclusionsThe study has highlighted patients' perspectives on essential components for inclusion in diabetes apps to promote engagement and foster better health outcomes.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsAdolescentAdultAgedAsiaAustraliaCell PhoneDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2EuropeExerciseFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID30532235
PMCPMC6287843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.