Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30532196›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Zoonotic multidrug-resistant microorganisms among small companion animals in Germany.

Ursula Kaspar, Alexa von Lützau, Andreas Schlattmann, Uwe Roesler, Robin Köck, Karsten Becker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antimicrobial resistance of coagulase-negativeOpen veterinary journal · 2025
    Article
  11. Veterinary sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Comparison ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Antimicrobial resistance profiles ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ursula KasparInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Alexa von LützauInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Andreas SchlattmannInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Uwe RoeslerInstitute for Animal Hygiene and Environmental Health, FU Berlin, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Robin KöckInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Karsten BeckerInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6391-1341

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDRO) can be transmitted between companion animals and their human owners. Aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) and Staphylococcus aureus including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in different companion animal species. Dogs (n = 192), cats (n = 74), and rabbits (n = 17), treated in a veterinary practice and hospital or living in an animal shelter and private households, were sampled. All facilities were located in a region characterized by a high density of pig production. Nasal, buccal and perianal swabs were enriched and cultured on solid chromogenic selective media. A subgroup of 20 animals (13 dogs, 3 cats, 4 rabbits) was analyzed for the presence of staphylococci other than S. aureus. Amongst all animals (n = 283), twenty dogs (10.4%) and six cats (8.1%) carried S. aureus. MRSA was found in five dogs (2.6%) and two cats (2.7%). Isolates were of spa types t011, t034, t108 (all mecA-positive, ST398), and t843 (mecC-positive, ST130), typical for livestock-associated (LA)-MRSA. Except for one dog, MRSA-positive animals did not have direct contact to husbandry. ESBL-Escherichia coli (blaCTX-M/blaTEM/blaSHV genes) were present in seven dogs (3.6%), one cat (1.4%) possessed a cefotaxime-resistant Citrobacter freundii isolate (blaTEM/blaCMY-2 genes). MDRO carriage was associated with animals from veterinary medical settings (p<0.05). One dog and one rabbit carried methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci. The exclusive occurrence of MRSA lineages typically described for livestock stresses the impact of MDRO strain dissemination across species barriers in regional settings. Presence of ESBL-E and LA-MRSA among pets and probable dissemination in clinical settings support the necessity of a "One Health" approach to address the potential threats due to MDRO-carrying companion animals.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsCat DiseasesCatsDog DiseasesDogsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEnterobacteriaceaeGermanyMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRabbitsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactams

Identifiers

PMID30532196
PMCPMC6285998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.