Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30532189›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Vector competence of biting midges and mosquitoes for Shuni virus.

Tim W R Möhlmann, Judith Oymans, Paul J Wichgers Schreur, Constantianus J M Koenraadt, Jeroen Kortekaas, Chantal B F Vogels

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Vector-borne diseases-knowledge maps.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A Review of the Vector Status of North AmericanCurrent tropical medicine reports · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. An Investigation ofViruses · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Viruses · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tim W R MöhlmannLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0351-0407
Judith OymansDepartment of Virology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Wageningen University & Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Paul J Wichgers SchreurDepartment of Virology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Wageningen University & Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Constantianus J M KoenraadtLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Jeroen KortekaasDepartment of Virology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Wageningen University & Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Chantal B F VogelsLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShuni virus (SHUV) is an orthobunyavirus that belongs to the Simbu serogroup. SHUV was isolated from diverse species of domesticated animals and wildlife, and is associated with neurological disease, abortions, and congenital malformations. Recently, SHUV caused outbreaks among ruminants in Israel, representing the first incursions outside the African continent. The isolation of SHUV from a febrile child in Nigeria and seroprevalence among veterinarians in South Africa suggests that the virus may have zoonotic potential as well. The high pathogenicity, extremely broad tropism, potential transmission via both biting midges and mosquitoes, and zoonotic features warrants prioritization of SHUV for further research. Additional knowledge is essential to accurately determine the risk for animal and human health, and to assess the risk of future epizootics and epidemics. To gain first insights into the potential involvement of arthropod vectors in SHUV transmission, we have investigated the ability of SHUV to infect and disseminate in laboratory-reared biting midges and mosquitoes. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsCulicoides nubeculosus, C. sonorensis, Culex pipiens pipiens, and Aedes aegypti were orally exposed to SHUV by providing an infectious blood meal. Biting midges showed high infection rates of approximately 40-60%, whereas infection rates of mosquitoes were lower than 2%. SHUV successfully disseminated in both species of biting midges, but no evidence of transmission in orally exposed mosquitoes was found. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study show that different species of Culicoides biting midges are susceptible to infection and dissemination of SHUV, whereas the two mosquito species tested were found not to be susceptible.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsBunyaviridae InfectionsCeratopogonidaeCulexFemaleHumansInsect VectorsMosquito VectorsNigeriaOrthobunyavirusSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID30532189
PMCPMC6285265
OpenAlexW4255725051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.