ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018
Vector competence of biting midges and mosquitoes for Shuni virus.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiological investigation of Shuni virus infections in hospitals in two provinces of South Africa (2019-2021) using molecular and serological surveillance.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Vector-borne diseases-knowledge maps.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Identification and mapping of potential and highly likely vectors for selected vector-borne diseases in the EU and neighbouring countries.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Effect of increased CpG and UpA dinucleotides in the West Nile virus genome on virus transmission byJournal of virology · 2025Article
- The Role of Hematophagous Arthropods, Other than Mosquitoes and Ticks, in Arbovirus Transmission.Viruses · 2025Review
- Competition between two Usutu virus isolates in cell culture and in the common house mosquitoFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- A Review of the Vector Status of North AmericanCurrent tropical medicine reports · 2022Review
- Potential Mosquito Vectors for Shuni Virus, South Africa, 2014-2018.Emerging infectious diseases · 2021Article
- An Investigation ofViruses · 2021Article
- Shuni Virus Replicates at the Maternal-Fetal Interface of the Ovine and Human Placenta.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Competition between Usutu virus and West Nile virus during simultaneous and sequential infection ofEmerging microbes & infections · 2020Article
- Impact of Gut Bacteria on the Infection and Transmission of Pathogenic Arboviruses by Biting Midges and Mosquitoes.Microbial ecology · 2020Article
- Reverse Genetics System for Shuni Virus, an Emerging Orthobunyavirus with Zoonotic Potential.Viruses · 2020Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundShuni virus (SHUV) is an orthobunyavirus that belongs to the Simbu serogroup. SHUV was isolated from diverse species of domesticated animals and wildlife, and is associated with neurological disease, abortions, and congenital malformations. Recently, SHUV caused outbreaks among ruminants in Israel, representing the first incursions outside the African continent. The isolation of SHUV from a febrile child in Nigeria and seroprevalence among veterinarians in South Africa suggests that the virus may have zoonotic potential as well. The high pathogenicity, extremely broad tropism, potential transmission via both biting midges and mosquitoes, and zoonotic features warrants prioritization of SHUV for further research. Additional knowledge is essential to accurately determine the risk for animal and human health, and to assess the risk of future epizootics and epidemics. To gain first insights into the potential involvement of arthropod vectors in SHUV transmission, we have investigated the ability of SHUV to infect and disseminate in laboratory-reared biting midges and mosquitoes. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsCulicoides nubeculosus, C. sonorensis, Culex pipiens pipiens, and Aedes aegypti were orally exposed to SHUV by providing an infectious blood meal. Biting midges showed high infection rates of approximately 40-60%, whereas infection rates of mosquitoes were lower than 2%. SHUV successfully disseminated in both species of biting midges, but no evidence of transmission in orally exposed mosquitoes was found. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study show that different species of Culicoides biting midges are susceptible to infection and dissemination of SHUV, whereas the two mosquito species tested were found not to be susceptible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.