Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30532029›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Parent-embryo acoustic communication: a specialised heat vocalisation allowing embryonic eavesdropping.

Mylene M Mariette, Anaïs Pessato, William A Buttemer, Andrew E McKechnie, Eve Udino, Rodney N Collins, Alizée Meillère, Andrew T D Bennett, Katherine L Buchanan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Neurobiology and Changing Ecosystems: Mechanisms Underlying Responses to Human-Generated Environmental Impacts.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mylene M MarietteCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life & Environmental Sciences, Deakin University Geelong, Geelong, Australia. m.mariette@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0567-4111
Anaïs PessatoCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life & Environmental Sciences, Deakin University Geelong, Geelong, Australia.
William A ButtemerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Andrew E McKechnieDST-NRF Centre of Excellence at the FitzPatrick Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Eve UdinoCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life & Environmental Sciences, Deakin University Geelong, Geelong, Australia.
Rodney N CollinsCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life & Environmental Sciences, Deakin University Geelong, Geelong, Australia.
Alizée MeillèreCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life & Environmental Sciences, Deakin University Geelong, Geelong, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1323-1954
Andrew T D BennettCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life & Environmental Sciences, Deakin University Geelong, Geelong, Australia.
Katherine L BuchananCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life & Environmental Sciences, Deakin University Geelong, Geelong, Australia.
Deakin University · AUSouth African National Biodiversity Institute · ZAUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council (ARC) DE170100824Australian Research Council (ARC) DP180100250Australian Research Council (ARC) DP180101207Australian Research Council (ARC) FT14010013Australian Research Council (ARC) LP140100691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sound is arguably the external cue most accessible to embryos of many species, and as such may constitute an unrivalled source of early information. Recent evidence shows that prenatal sounds, similarly to maternal effects, may shape developmental trajectories. Establishing whether parental vocalisations are signals directed at embryos, or parental cues on which embryos eavesdrop, can elucidate whether parents or embryos control developmental outcomes. Prenatal exposure to a characteristic heat-related parental call was recently shown to alter zebra finch growth and fitness. Here, we test the ecological context of this behaviour in the wild, and assess the information value and specificity of this vocalisation for an embryonic audience. We show that wild zebra finches also produce this characteristic call, only at high temperatures. In addition, in the lab, we demonstrate experimentally that calling is specifically triggered by high air temperatures, can occur without an embryonic audience, and importantly, is predicted by individuals' body mass. Overall, our findings reveal a specialised heat vocalisation that enables embryonic eavesdropping, by indicating high ambient temperatures, and parents' capacity to cope with such conditions. This challenges the traditional view of embryos as passive agents of their development, and opens exciting research avenues on avian adaptation to extreme heat.

Indexed as

AcousticsAnimalsCommunicationCuesEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic DevelopmentEquidaeFinchesHot TemperatureParentsVocalization, Animal

Identifiers

PMID30532029
PMCPMC6286336
OpenAlexW2903082049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.