Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30532026›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

AnnexinA5-pHrodo: a new molecular probe for measuring efferocytosis.

R Stöhr, N Deckers, L Schurgers, N Marx, C P Reutelingsperger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Annexin Animal Models-From Fundamental Principles to Translational Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

R StöhrMedizinische Klinik I, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. rstoehr@ukaachen.de.
N DeckersCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht Department of Biochemistry, University of Maastricht Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
L SchurgersCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht Department of Biochemistry, University of Maastricht Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7867-6957
N MarxMedizinische Klinik I, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
C P ReutelingspergerCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht Department of Biochemistry, University of Maastricht Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2334-9403
Maastricht University · NLRWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efferocytosis, the clearing of dead or dying cells from living tissues, is a highly programmed, vital process to maintain the healthy functioning of every organism. Disorders of efferocytosis have been linked to several chronic diseases including atherosclerosis and auto-immune diseases. To date several different assays to determine phagocytosis, using microscopy or FACS analysis with labelled targets, have been developed. However, many of these are unable to differentiate between cells that have truly been phagocytosed and those still present on the surface of the macrophages hindering exact assessment of efferocytotic capacity. We herein describe AnxA5-pHrodo and its negative control M1234-pHrodo as new molecular probes to measure in vitro as well as ex-vivo efferocytotic capacity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnnexin A5ApoptosisAtherosclerosisCell LineHumansJurkat CellsMacrophagesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMolecular ProbesPhagocytosisAnnexin A5Molecular Probes

Identifiers

PMID30532026
PMCPMC6286334
OpenAlexW2902099006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.