ArticleScientific reports2018
Task-Based Model Observer Assessment of A Partial Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in Thoracic Oncologic Multidetector CT.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of deep-learning iterative reconstruction combined with high-frequency kernels in CT: a task-based image quality study.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Task-based evaluation of axial and multiplanar reconstructions in computed tomography: A volumetric analysis of spatial resolution, noise, and detectability.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Voxelwise characterization of noise for a clinical photon-counting CT scanner with a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Coronary CT angiography for the assessment of atherosclerotic plaque inflammation: postmortem proof of concept with histological validation.European radiology · 2024Article
- Prospective evaluation of deep learning image reconstruction for Lung-RADS and automatic nodule volumetry on ultralow-dose chest CT.PloS one · 2024Article
- Quality Assessment of Computed Tomography Images using a Channelized Hoteling Observer: Optimization of Protocols in Clinical Practice.Advanced biomedical research · 2023Article
- Quantum Iterative Reconstruction for Low-Dose Ultra-High-Resolution Photon-Counting Detector CT of the Lung.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparison of virtual monoenergetic imaging between a rapid kilovoltage switching dual-energy computed tomography with deep-learning and four dual-energy CTs with iterative reconstruction.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Comparison of image quality between spectral photon-counting CT and dual-layer CT for the evaluation of lung nodules: a phantom study.European radiology · 2022Article
- Effect of a new deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for abdominal computed tomography imaging on image quality and dose reduction compared with two iterative reconstruction algorithms: a phantom study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Performance of Spectral Photon-Counting Coronary CT Angiography and Comparison with Energy-Integrating-Detector CT: Objective Assessment with Model Observer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Performance of four dual-energy CT platforms for abdominal imaging: a task-based image quality assessment based on phantom data.European radiology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the impact of a partial model-based iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V) on image quality in thoracic oncologic multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), using human and mathematical model observers. Twenty cancer patients examined with regular-dose thoracic-abdominal-pelvic MDCT were retrospectively included. Thoracic images reconstructed using a sharp kernel and filtered back-projection (reference) or ASiR-V (0-100%, 20% increments; follow-up) were analysed by three thoracic radiologists. Advanced quantitative physical metrics, including detectability indexes of simulated 4-mm-diameter solid non-calcified nodules and ground-glass opacities, were computed at regular and reduced doses using a custom-designed phantom. All three radiologists preferred higher ASiR-V levels (best = 80%). Increasing ASiR-V substantially decreased noise magnitude, with slight changes in noise texture. For high-contrast objects, changing the ASiR-V level had no major effect on spatial resolution; whereas for lower-contrast objects, increasing ASiR-V substantially decreased spatial resolution, more markedly at reduced dose. For both high- and lower-contrast pulmonary lesions, detectability remained excellent, regardless of ASiR-V and dose levels, and increased significantly with increasing ASiR-V levels (all p < 0.001). While high ASiR-V levels (80%) are recommended to detect solid non-calcified nodules and ground-glass opacities in regular-dose thoracic oncologic MDCT, care must be taken because, for lower-contrast pulmonary lesions, high ASiR-V levels slightly change noise texture and substantially decrease spatial resolution, more markedly at reduced dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.