Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30531988›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Task-Based Model Observer Assessment of A Partial Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in Thoracic Oncologic Multidetector CT.

David C Rotzinger, Damien Racine, Catherine Beigelman-Aubry, Khalid M Alfudhili, Nathalie Keller, Pascal Monnin, Francis R Verdun, Fabio Becce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David C RotzingerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Damien RacineInstitute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Grand-Pré 1, 1007, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Catherine Beigelman-AubryDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. catherine.beigelman-aubry@chuv.ch.
Khalid M AlfudhiliDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nathalie KellerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pascal MonninInstitute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Grand-Pré 1, 1007, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Francis R VerdunInstitute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Grand-Pré 1, 1007, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Fabio BecceDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the impact of a partial model-based iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V) on image quality in thoracic oncologic multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), using human and mathematical model observers. Twenty cancer patients examined with regular-dose thoracic-abdominal-pelvic MDCT were retrospectively included. Thoracic images reconstructed using a sharp kernel and filtered back-projection (reference) or ASiR-V (0-100%, 20% increments; follow-up) were analysed by three thoracic radiologists. Advanced quantitative physical metrics, including detectability indexes of simulated 4-mm-diameter solid non-calcified nodules and ground-glass opacities, were computed at regular and reduced doses using a custom-designed phantom. All three radiologists preferred higher ASiR-V levels (best = 80%). Increasing ASiR-V substantially decreased noise magnitude, with slight changes in noise texture. For high-contrast objects, changing the ASiR-V level had no major effect on spatial resolution; whereas for lower-contrast objects, increasing ASiR-V substantially decreased spatial resolution, more markedly at reduced dose. For both high- and lower-contrast pulmonary lesions, detectability remained excellent, regardless of ASiR-V and dose levels, and increased significantly with increasing ASiR-V levels (all p < 0.001). While high ASiR-V levels (80%) are recommended to detect solid non-calcified nodules and ground-glass opacities in regular-dose thoracic oncologic MDCT, care must be taken because, for lower-contrast pulmonary lesions, high ASiR-V levels slightly change noise texture and substantially decrease spatial resolution, more markedly at reduced dose.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsArtifactsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyPelvisPhantoms, ImagingRadiation DosageRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiography, ThoracicRadionuclide ImagingRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30531988
PMCPMC6286352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.