Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30531899›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Comparison of four staining methods for detecting eosinophils in nasal polyps.

Yu Song, Jinshu Yin, Hong Chang, Quan Zhou, Hong Peng, Wei Ji, Qingkun Song

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Involvement of inflammatory cells in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yu SongPeking University Ninth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, 100038, China.
Jinshu YinPeking University Ninth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, 100038, China. yinjinshu55@aliyun.com.
Hong ChangDepartment of Pathology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, China.
Quan ZhouDepartment of Pathology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, China.
Hong PengDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, China.
Wei JiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, China.
Qingkun SongDepartment of science and technology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, China.
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing Shijitan Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aimed to find a more appropriate method to detect eosinophils in formalin- fixed nasal polyps, since there is no consensus on the standard counting method of eosinophils now. Four 5 μm serial sections were obtained from each 10% neutral formalin-fixed paraffin block and were stained with Chromotrope 2R, Congo red, MBPmAb immunohistochemistry, and conventional hematoxylin and eosin stain respectively. Each section was scanned by the Aperio digital section scanner. The same selected areas were procured for assessment in the serial sections. Chromotrope 2R and MBPmAb immunohistochemistry were specific in detecting eosinophils, which had the lower background staining compared with Congo red and conventional hematoxylin and eosin stain. There were significant differences among the four methods in terms of the eosinophil counting data (p < 0.05), while no significant difference between Chromotrope 2R and Congo red (P = 0.1413). The eosinophil counts in nasal polyps could be more accurately assessed by Chromotrope 2R and Congo red compared with MBPmAb immunohistochemistry and conventional hematoxylin and eosin stain. The popularization of Chromotrope 2R and Congo red may help to unify the eosinophil count in the definition of eosinophilic CRSwNP.

Indexed as

Coloring AgentsCongo RedEosinophilsFormaldehydeHumansImmunohistochemistryLeukocyte CountNaphthalenesulfonatesNasal PolypsStaining and Labelingchromotrope 2RColoring AgentsCongo RedFormaldehydeNaphthalenesulfonates

Identifiers

PMID30531899
PMCPMC6286356
OpenAlexW2903423209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.