ArticleHeredity2019
Estimating the number of sexual events per generation in a facultatively sexual haploid population.
Article in Heredity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drivers of Mating Type Composition in Tetrahymena thermophila.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Article
- Invasion and Extinction Dynamics of Mating Types Under Facultative Sexual Reproduction.Genetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In populations of facultatively sexual organisms, the proportion of sexually produced offspring contributed to each generation is a critical determinant of their evolutionary potential. However, estimating this parameter in natural populations has proved difficult. Here we develop a population genetic model for estimating the number of sexual events occurring per generation for facultatively sexual haploids possessing a biallelic mating-type locus (e.g., Chlamydomonas, ascomycete fungi). Our model treats the population as two subpopulations possessing opposite mating-type alleles, which exchange genes only when a sexual event takes place. Where mating types are equally abundant, we show that, for a neutral genetic marker, genetic differentiation between mating-type subpopulations is a simple function of the effective population size, the frequency of sexual reproduction, and the recombination fraction between the genetic marker and the mating-type locus. We employ simulations to examine the effects of linkage of markers to the mating-type locus, inequality of mating-type frequencies, mutation rate, and selection on this relationship. Finally, we apply our model to estimate the number of sexual reproduction events per generation in populations of four species of facultatively sexual ascomycete fungi, which have been jointly scored for mating type and a range of polymorphic molecular markers. Relative estimates are in line with expectations based on the known reproductive biology of these species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.