Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30531575›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2019

Cohort Analysis of Immigrant Rhetoric on Timely and Regular Access of Prenatal Care.

Derrick M Chu, Joshua Aagaard, Ryan Levitt, Megan Whitham, Joan Mastrobattista, Martha Rac, Catherine Eppes, Manisha Gandhi, Michael A Belfort, Kjersti M Aagaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The roles of COVID-19 pandemic exposure and telehealth in prenatal care access for rural and racial minority communities in the United States: A retrospective cohort study.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Immigration Policy and the Health of Latina Mothers and Their Infants.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Derrick M ChuDepartments of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Divisions of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine & Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas; St. Olaf College, Northfield, Minnesota; the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas; and the National School for Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, and the Department of Molecular & Human Genetics at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Joshua Aagaard
Ryan Levitt
Megan Whitham
Joan Mastrobattista
Martha Rac
Catherine Eppes
Manisha Gandhi
Michael A Belfort
Kjersti M Aagaard

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007330 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI PLON, SHARON E. · 1985 to 2019
$15.6M
Training Program in Translational Biology and Molecular MedicineT32GM088129 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ROONEY, CLIONA M., VAN DEN VEYVER, IGNATIA B · 2010 to 2019
$3.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007330NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM088129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess whether recent anti-immigration rhetoric is significantly associated with inadequate prenatal care.

methodsThis was a population-based cohort study (2011-2017). In their native language, patients were consented and queried regarding country of origin and time in the United States. Additional variables were collected or abstracted from the medical record, including documentation and timing of prenatal visits. Based on relevance and prevalence during the study period, publicly available Google search trends were mined for the terms "Make America Great Again," "Mexico Wall," and "Deportation" by geographic region. The time of first deviation from the mode Google search popularity value for each term was ascertained (mode inflection date). Perinatal data was averaged over 15 days moving windows, and the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index was used to categorically define inadequate prenatal care by validated standards.

resultsTwenty-four thousand nine hundred thirty-three deliveries occurred during the study period. A mode inflection date was extrapolated from Google trend analytics and used to define the period before change in trends use pre (before rhetoric) and post (after rhetoric). Coincident to the rhetoric change, there was a significant increase in days until the first prenatal visit, fewer prenatal visits, and a decreased trend of mean hemoglobin nadir among U.S. non-native Hispanic women (P<.001). Immigrant status was an independent predictor of inadequate prenatal care as defined by the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index standard, with increased adjusted odds among Hispanic women (adjusted odds ratio 1.581, 95% CI 1.407-1.777 [1.4-1.8]) coincident with anti-immigration rhetoric.

conclusionOur findings are of likely significant public health importance and suggest that recent anti-immigrant rhetoric is associated with adequate, timely, and regular access to prenatal care among nearly 25,000 deliveries in Houston, Texas.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsHealth Services AccessibilityPrenatal CareAdultCentral AmericaCohort StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansMexicoPoliticsPregnancySouth AmericaTexasWomen's Health Services

Identifiers

PMID30531575
PMCPMC6309499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.