Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30531534›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in critical care2019

Bedside respiratory physiology to detect risk of lung injury in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Jeremy R Beitler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in critical care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jeremy R BeitlerDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Center for Acute Respiratory Failure, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

Breath stacking dyssynchrony in acute respiratory distress syndromeK23HL133489 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BEITLER, JEREMY R. · 2017 to 2021
$871k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL133489NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL129438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe most effective strategies for treating the patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome center on minimizing ventilation-induced lung injury (VILI). Yet, current standard-of-care does little to modify mechanical ventilation to patient-specific risk. This review focuses on evaluation of bedside respiratory mechanics, which when interpreted in patient-specific context, affords opportunity to individualize lung-protective ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. RECENT

findingsFour biophysical mechanisms of VILI are widely accepted: volutrauma, barotrauma, atelectrauma, and stress concentration. Resulting biotrauma, that is, local and systemic inflammation and endothelial activation, may be thought of as the final common pathway that propagates VILI-mediated multiorgan failure. Conventional, widely utilized techniques to assess VILI risk rely on airway pressure, flow, and volume changes, and remain essential tools for determining overdistension of aerated lung regions, particularly when interpreted cognizant of their limitations. Emerging bedside tools identify regional differences in mechanics, but further study is required to identify how they might best be incorporated into clinical practice. SUMMARY: Quantifying patient-specific risk of VILI requires understanding each patient's pulmonary mechanics in context of biological predisposition. Tailoring support at bedside according to these factors affords the greatest opportunity to date for mitigating VILI and alleviating associated morbidity.

Indexed as

Respiratory Distress SyndromeVentilator-Induced Lung InjuryBarotraumaHumansInflammationLungLung InjuryMultiple Organ FailurePositive-Pressure RespirationRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory MechanicsTidal Volume

Identifiers

PMID30531534
PMCPMC6402876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.