Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30531525›Full record

ArticleMedical care2019

Symptom Care at Home: A Comprehensive and Pragmatic PRO System Approach to Improve Cancer Symptom Care.

Kathi Mooney, Meagan S Whisenant, Susan L Beck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. September 2026 Letter to the Editor.Oncology nursing forum · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Patient-reported outcomes after CAR T-cell therapy in patients with hematological malignancies.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Preemptive Forecasting of Symptom Escalation in Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kathi MooneyHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Meagan S WhisenantDepartment of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Susan L BeckUniversity of Utah (emeritus), Salt Lake City, UT.

Funding

Telephone Linked Care: An IT Enabled Integrated System for Cancer Symptom ReliefR01CA120558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MOONEY, KATHLEEN H · 2007 to 2012
$5.2M
University of Utah Center for Clinical and Translational Science-UL1UL1TR000105 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCCLAIN, DONALD A. · 2012 to 2013
$5.1M
Interdisciplinary Training in Cancer, Caregiving and End-of-Life CareT32NR013456 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ELLINGTON, LEE A, MOONEY, KATHLEEN H · 2013 to 2022
$3.4M
TELEPHONE LINKED CARE FOR CANCER SYMPTOM MANAGEMENTR01CA089474 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MOONEY, KATHLEEN H · 2001 to 2003
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000105NCI NIH HHS R01 CA089474NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120558NINR NIH HHS T32 NR013456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is growing recognition that systematically obtaining the patient's perspective on their health experience, using patient-reported outcomes (PRO), can be used to improve patient care in real time. Few PRO systems are designed to monitor and provide symptom management support between visits. Patients are instructed to contact providers between visits with their concerns, but they rarely do, leaving patients to cope with symptoms alone at home. We developed and tested an automated system, Symptom Care at Home (SCH), to address this gap in tracking and responding to PRO data in-between clinic visits. The purpose of this paper is to describe SCH as an example of a comprehensive PRO system that addresses unmet need for symptom support outside the clinic. METHODS FOR PRO SCORE

interpretationSCH uses pragmatic, single-item measures for assessing symptoms, which are commonly used and readily interpretable for both patients and providers. We established alerting values for PRO symptom data, which was particularly important for conserving oncology providers' time in responding to daily PRO data. METHODS FOR DEVELOPING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTING ON PRO

resultsThe SCH system provides automated, just-in-time self-management coaching tailored to the specific symptom pattern and severity levels reported in the daily call. In addition, the SCH system includes a provider decision support system for follow-up symptom assessment and intervention strategies. DISCUSSION: SCH provides PRO monitoring, tailored automated self-management coaching, and alerts the oncology team of poorly controlled symptoms with a provider dashboard that includes evidence-based decision support for follow-up to improve individual patients' symptom care. We particularly emphasize our process for PRO selection, rationale for determining alerting thresholds, and the design of the provider dashboard and decision support. Currently, we are in the process of updating the SCH system, developing both web-based and app versions in addition to interactive voice response phone access and integrating the SCH system in the electronic health record.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAntineoplastic AgentsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansNeoplasmsSelf-ManagementSymptom AssessmentTelemedicineAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID30531525
PMCPMC8087999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.