ReviewCurrent opinion in nephrology and hypertension2019
Differences in national and international guidelines regarding use of kidney stone formers as living kidney donors.
Review in Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Donor-gifted nephrolithiasis: case-based analysis and comparative study.The Canadian journal of urology · 2025Article
- Manual manipulation and ex vivo flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy to salvage deceased donor kidneys with renal stones: a case series.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Do Factors Influencing Acceptance of Kidney Stone Formers as Donors Predict Subsequent Stone Events?Clinical transplantation · 2025Article
- Throwing stones: kidney stone incidence in living kidney donor candidates with increased metabolic risk.Renal failure · 2023Article
- Clinical and Kidney Structural Characteristics of Living Kidney Donors With Nephrolithiasis and Their Long-term Outcomes.Transplantation direct · 2022Article
- Practice Patterns for the Acceptance of Medically Complex Living Kidney Donors with Hematuria, Sickle Cell Trait, Smoking, Illegal Drug Use, or Urological Issues: A Multinational Survey.Avicenna journal of medicine · 2021Article
- Editorial: Controversies in kidney stones and other chronic kidney disease topics.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewTraditionally, nephrolithiasis was considered a relative contraindication to kidney donation because of a risk of recurrent stones in donors and adverse stone-related outcomes in recipients. However, the scarcity of organs has driven the transplant community to re-examine and broaden selection criteria for living donors with stones. In this review, we summarize and contrast the guidelines published by various prominent national and international societies on this topic. RECENT
findingsAlthough recent iterations of living donor guidelines are less stringent with respect to nephrolithiasis than those published in the 1990s, there is little consensus among national and international transplant society guidelines regarding selection criteria for potential kidney donors with nephrolithiasis. SUMMARY: The lack of evidence-based guidelines deters transplant centers from implementing selection criteria to accept donors with nephrolithiasis and discourages studies of outcomes in donors with nephrolithiasis and their recipients. In addition to drawing attention to the disparities in prevailing guidelines, we put forth several questions that must be answered before generalizable criteria for selection of donor with nephrolithiasis can be developed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.