ArticleInternational journal of mycobacteriology
Infection of multiple
Article in International journal of mycobacteriology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Appearance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) in the sputum of a tuberculosis (TB)/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infected patient under treatment may indicate either failure or new infection. This study aims to evaluate whether TB treatment failure among TB/HIV co-infected patients is a real failure. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted among 566 TB/HIV co-infected patients who started TB treatment in 12 townships in the upper Myanmar. Among the 566 participants, 16 (2.8%) resulted in treatment failure. We performed a molecular study using mycobacterial interspersed repetitive-unit-variable number of tandem repeat (MIRU-VNTR) genotyping for them. The MIRU-VNTR profiles were analyzed using the web server, MIRU-VNTRplus. All data were entered into EpiData version 3.1 and analyzed using R version 3.4.3. Results: Among 16 failure patients, seven had incomplete laboratory results. Of the nine remaining patients, nobody had exactly the same MIRU-VNTR pattern between the initial and final isolates. Four patients had persistent East-African Indian (EAI) lineages and one each had persistent Beijing lineage, changing from EAI to Beijing, from Beijing to EAI, NEW-1 to Beijing, and NEW-1 to X strains. Female patients have significantly larger genetic difference between MTB of the paired isolates than male patients (t-test, P = 0.04). Conclusion: Thus, in our study patients, infection of multiple MTB strains is a possible cause of TB treatment failure. Explanation for the association between gender and distance of genotypes from the initial to subsequent MTB infection needs further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.