Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30531022›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

A multi-institution consensus on how to perform EUS-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction.

Jintao Guo, Marc Giovannini, Anand V Sahai, Adrian Saftoiu, Christoph F Dietrich, Erwin Santo, Pietro Fusaroli, Ali A Siddiqui, Manoop S Bhutani, Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh and 39 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: a literature review.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2023
    Review
  9. Endoscopic palliation of malignant biliary obstruction.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

49 authors.

Jintao GuoEndoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China.
Marc GiovanniniPathology Unit (Flora Poizat), Institute Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Anand V SahaiCenter Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Adrian SaftoiuDepartment of Endoscopy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Craiova, Romania.
Christoph F DietrichMedical Department II, Caritas Hospital, Bad Mergentheim, Germany.
Erwin SantoTel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Pietro FusaroliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Ali A SiddiquiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Manoop S BhutaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Anthony Yuen Bun TeohDepartment of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Atsushi IrisawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Japan.
Brenda Lucia Arturo AriasSurgical Clinical Gastroenterolgy, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia.
Chalapathi Rao AchantaGastroenterologist at Queen's NRI Hospital, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Christian JenssenKrankenhaus Märkisch Oderland Strausberg, Wriezen, Germany.
Dong-Wan SeoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Douglas G AdlerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Evangelos KalaitzakisDivision of Endoscopy, Gastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Everson ArtifonDepartment of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Fumihide ItokawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Adventist Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Jan Werner PoleyErasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Girish MishraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Khek Yu HoDepartment of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Hsiu-Po WangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China.
Hussein Hassan OkashaInternal Medicine Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Jesse LachterRambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Juan J VilaEndoscopy Unit, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Julio Iglesias-GarciaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Kenji YamaoAichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Kenjiro YasudaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Kensuke KubotaDepartment of Endoscopy, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Laurent PalazzoTrocadero Clinic, Paris, France.
Luis Carlos SabbaghClinica Reina Sofia, Bogota, Colombia.
Malay SharmaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jaswant Rai Specialty Hospital, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Mitsuhiro KidaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University East Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan.
Mohamed El-NadyInternal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Nam Q NguyenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, Australia.
Peter VilmannDivision of Endoscopy, Gastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pramod Kumar GargDepartment of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Praveer RaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Shuntaro MukaiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Silvia CarraraDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Sreeram ParupudiTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Subbaramiah SridharSection of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Sundeep LakhtakiaAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Surinder S RanaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Takeshi Ogura2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
Todd H BaronDivision of Gastroenterology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Vinay DhirDepartment of Gastroenterology, SL Raheja Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Siyu SunEndoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesEUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) was shown to be useful for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). However, there is lack of consensus on how EUS-BD should be performed.

methodsThis was a worldwide multi-institutional survey among members of the International Society of EUS conducted in February 2018. The survey consisted of 10 questions related to the practice of EUS-BD.

resultsForty-six endoscopists of them completed the survey. The majority of endoscopists felt that EUS-BD could replace percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage after failure of ERCP. Among all EUS-BD methods, the rendezvous stenting technique should be the first choice. Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) were recommended by most endoscopists. For EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS), superiority of partially-covered SEMS over fully-covered SEMS was not in agreement. 6-Fr cystotomes were recommended for fistula creation. During the HGS approach, longer SEMS (8 or 10 cm) was recommended. During the choledochoduodenostomy approach, 6-cm SEMS was recommended. During the intrahepatic (IH) approach, the IH segment 3 was recommended.

conclusionThis is the first worldwide survey on the practice of EUS-BD for MBO. There were wide variations in practice, and randomized studies are urgently needed to establish the best approach for the management of this condition.

Indexed as

ConsensusEUS-guided biliary drainagequestionnaire survey

Identifiers

PMID30531022
PMCPMC6289007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.